Thomas F. White 1991 Trust v. Connell et al

Filing 46

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE ATTORNEYS' FEES by Judge Judge William Alsup granting 45 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KATHLEEN V. FISHER, ESQ. (SBN 70838) kfisher@calvofisher.com RODNEY J. JACOB, ESQ. (SBN 146428) rjacob@calvofisher.com ALEXANDER M. FREEMAN (SBN 237811) afreeman@calvofisher.com CALVO FISHER & JACOB LLP Attorneys at Law 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1155 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 374-8370 Facsimile: (415) 374-8373 8 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Petitioners Shane Claridge Kelley, as Trustee of Thomas F. White 1991 Trust, and Jack Eugene Teeters 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 THOMAS F. WHITE 1991 TRUST 15 16 Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION RE: ATTORNEY’S FEES v. Hon. William H. Alsup 17 18 Case No. 3:17-cv-03177-WHA DAVID WILLIAM CONNELL, et al., Defendants. 1 2 On August 17, 2017, the Court issued its Order Re Attorney’s Fees and Costs, which awarded 3 the Plaintiff Thomas F. White 1991 Trust dated July 17, 1991 as amended and restated (“Trust”) its fees 4 relating to its motion to remand granted by the Court on August 17, 2017. After the Trust’s counsel 5 submitted a fee declaration, and Defendants’ counsel submitted objections, the Court on September 19, 6 2017 issued its Order Re Fee Objections (Dkt. No. 43), disposing of certain objections made by 7 Defendants. The parties thereafter met and conferred regarding Defendants’ remaining objections, which 8 led to the Stipulation Re: Attorney’s Fees, filed with the Court on September 27, 2017. Good cause 9 appearing therefor: 10 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation Re: Attorney’s Fees is approved. 11 12 Dated: September 28, , 2017 13 14 15 16 HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?