Stringer v. Combe, Inc. et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 STIPULATION to continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference continued to 10/18/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 10/11/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/25/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
DENNIS S. ELLIS (SB# 178196)
dennisellis@paulhastings.com
KATHERINE F. MURRAY (SB# 211987)
katherinemurray@paulhastings.com
COURTNEY DETHOMAS (SB# 294591)
courtneydethomas@paulhastings.com
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
515 South Flower Street, Twenty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228
Tel.: (213) 683-6000; Fax: (213) 627-0705
6
7
8
9
10
11
K. LEE MARSHALL (SB# 277092)
klmarshall@bryancave.com
BRYAN CAVE LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4070
Tel.: (415) 268-2000; Fax: (415) 268-1999
Attorneys for Defendants
COMBE, INC.; COMBE PRODUCTS, INC; COMBE
LABORATORIES, INC.; and COMBE
INTERNATIONAL LTD.
12
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
JOHN STRINGER, individually and on behalf
of all other similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMBE, INC.; COMBE PRODUCTS, INC;
COMBE LABORATORIES, INC.; and
COMBE INTERNATIONAL LTD.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 17-CV-03192-WHO
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Current Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
September 12, 2017
2:00 p.m.
2
Hon. William H. Orrick
Proposed Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
October 18, 2017
2:00 p.m.
2
Hon. William H. Orrick
22
23
24
25
26
[Declaration of Katherine F. Murray filed and
served concurrently herewith]
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, on July 3, 2017, the Court issued a Case Management Conference Order
3
(Dkt. No. 10), setting the initial Case Management Conference in this matter for September 12,
4
2017, at 2 p.m. in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102;
5
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff John Stringer (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Combe Inc.,
6
Combe Products, Inc., Combe Laboratories, Inc., and Combe International Ltd. (collectively,
7
“Combe”) are scheduled to appear before the Court on October 18, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in
8
connection with Combe’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Class Allegations;
9
WHEREAS, following discussions between counsel for Plaintiff and Combe, the parties
10
are agreeable to moving the initial Case Management Conference to October 18, 2017, so as to
11
coordinate with the hearing on Combe’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Class
12
Allegations;
13
14
THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between counsel for Plaintiff and
Combe that, subject to the Court’s approval:
15
The initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for September 12, 2017 at
16
2:00 p.m., shall be continued to October 18, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. before the Honorable William H.
17
Orrick, and all deadlines dictated by the timing of the initial Case Management Conference shall
18
be adjusted accordingly.
19
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
DATED: August 23, 2017
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
By:
/s/
Katherine F. Murray
Attorneys for Defendants
COMBE, INC.; COMBE PRODUCTS, INC; COMBE
LABORATORIES, INC.; and COMBE
INTERNATIONAL LTD.
27
28
-0STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
DATED: August 23, 2017
2
URBAN & TAYLOR S.C.
By:
/s/
Jay A. Urban
3
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN STRINGER
4
5
6
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories concur with this filing.
7
8
By:
9
/s/
Katherine F. Murray
10
11
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 25, 2017
By:
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Court Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?