Stringer v. Combe, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 STIPULATION to continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference continued to 10/18/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 10/11/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/25/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DENNIS S. ELLIS (SB# 178196) dennisellis@paulhastings.com KATHERINE F. MURRAY (SB# 211987) katherinemurray@paulhastings.com COURTNEY DETHOMAS (SB# 294591) courtneydethomas@paulhastings.com PAUL HASTINGS LLP 515 South Flower Street, Twenty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228 Tel.: (213) 683-6000; Fax: (213) 627-0705 6 7 8 9 10 11 K. LEE MARSHALL (SB# 277092) klmarshall@bryancave.com BRYAN CAVE LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4070 Tel.: (415) 268-2000; Fax: (415) 268-1999 Attorneys for Defendants COMBE, INC.; COMBE PRODUCTS, INC; COMBE LABORATORIES, INC.; and COMBE INTERNATIONAL LTD. 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 JOHN STRINGER, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. COMBE, INC.; COMBE PRODUCTS, INC; COMBE LABORATORIES, INC.; and COMBE INTERNATIONAL LTD., Defendants. CASE NO. 17-CV-03192-WHO JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Current Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: September 12, 2017 2:00 p.m. 2 Hon. William H. Orrick Proposed Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: October 18, 2017 2:00 p.m. 2 Hon. William H. Orrick 22 23 24 25 26 [Declaration of Katherine F. Murray filed and served concurrently herewith] 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 STIPULATION WHEREAS, on July 3, 2017, the Court issued a Case Management Conference Order 3 (Dkt. No. 10), setting the initial Case Management Conference in this matter for September 12, 4 2017, at 2 p.m. in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102; 5 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff John Stringer (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Combe Inc., 6 Combe Products, Inc., Combe Laboratories, Inc., and Combe International Ltd. (collectively, 7 “Combe”) are scheduled to appear before the Court on October 18, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in 8 connection with Combe’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Class Allegations; 9 WHEREAS, following discussions between counsel for Plaintiff and Combe, the parties 10 are agreeable to moving the initial Case Management Conference to October 18, 2017, so as to 11 coordinate with the hearing on Combe’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Class 12 Allegations; 13 14 THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between counsel for Plaintiff and Combe that, subject to the Court’s approval: 15 The initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for September 12, 2017 at 16 2:00 p.m., shall be continued to October 18, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. before the Honorable William H. 17 Orrick, and all deadlines dictated by the timing of the initial Case Management Conference shall 18 be adjusted accordingly. 19 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED: August 23, 2017 PAUL HASTINGS LLP By: /s/ Katherine F. Murray Attorneys for Defendants COMBE, INC.; COMBE PRODUCTS, INC; COMBE LABORATORIES, INC.; and COMBE INTERNATIONAL LTD. 27 28 -0STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 DATED: August 23, 2017 2 URBAN & TAYLOR S.C. By: /s/ Jay A. Urban 3 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN STRINGER 4 5 6 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories concur with this filing. 7 8 By: 9 /s/ Katherine F. Murray 10 11 12 13 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 25, 2017 By: Hon. William H. Orrick United States District Court Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?