hiQ Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation

Filing 54

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #53 (Further Extending Deadline for LilnkedIn to Respond to the Complaint) filed by Linkedin Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/25/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2017)

1 JONATHAN H. BLAVIN (State Bar No. 230269)
[e-mail]
2 ROSEMARIE T. RING (State Bar No. 220769)
[e-mail]
3 LAURA K. LIN (State Bar No. 281542)
[e-mail]
4 NICHOLAS D. FRAM (State Bar No. 288293)
[e-mail]
5 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, 27th Floor
6 San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
7 Facsimile:
[phone]
8 Attorneys for Defendant LinkedIn Corporation
9 Counsel for hiQ Labs, Inc. Shown on Next Page
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
hiQ Labs, Inc.,

Case No. 17-CV-03301-EMC

15
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
17
LinkedIn Corporation,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 6-2 EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
LINKEDIN CORPORATION TO
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

18
Defendant.

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE. NO. 17-CV-03301-EMC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1 C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930)
[e-mail]
2 Deepak Gupta (State Bar No. 226991)
[e-mail]
3
Jeffrey G. Lau (State Bar No. 281629)
4 [e-mail]
Rebecca H. Stephens (State Bar No. 299234)
5 [e-mail]
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
6 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
7
Telephone: [phone]
[phone]
8 Facsimile:
9 Laurence H. Tribe* (Pro hac vice)
Carl M. Loeb University Professor and
10 Professor of Constitutional Law
11 Harvard Law School
1575 Massachusetts Avenue
12 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Telephone: [phone]
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

*Affiliation noted for identification purposes only

-2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CASE. NO. 17-CV-03301-EMC

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc. (“hiQ”) filed the complaint in this action against

3 Defendant LinkedIn Corporation (“LinkedIn”) on June 7, 2017 (ECF No. 1) and served LinkedIn
4 on June 8, 2017 (ECF No. 22);
5

WHEREAS, on June 27, 2017, pursuant to stipulation, the Court extended LinkedIn’s

6 deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint to and including July 31, 2017 (ECF No.
7 32);
8

WHEREAS, hiQ’s motion for a preliminary injunction is currently pending before the

9 court (ECF Nos. 23, 45);
10

WHEREAS, further extending LinkedIn’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the

11 complaint will conserve judicial resources and the resources of the parties;
12

THEREFORE, for good cause, LinkedIn and hiQ hereby stipulate that LinkedIn’s deadline

13 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to and including thirty (30) days from
14 the Court’s ruling on hiQ’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
15
16 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17 DATED: July 24, 2017
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

By:

/s/ Jonathan H. Blavin
Jonathan H. Blavin (SBN 230269)
[e-mail]
Rosemarie T. Ring (SBN 220769)
[e-mail]
Laura K. Lin (SBN 281542)
[e-mail]
Nicholas K. Fram (SBN 288293)
[e-mail]
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, 27th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant LinkedIn Corporation

28
-3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CASE. NO. 17-CV-03301-EMC

1 DATED: July 24, 2017
2

By:

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff hiQ Labs, Inc.

11
12

/s/ Deepak Gupta
C. Brandon Wisoff (SBN 121930)
[e-mail]
Deepak Gupta (SBN 226991)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey G. Lau (SBN 281629)
[e-mail]
Rebecca H. Stephens (SBN 299234)
[e-mail]
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1 Attestation

13
I, Jonathan H. Blavin, am the ECF user whose credentials were utilized in the electronic
14
filing of this document. In accordance with N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that
15
Deepak Gupta concurred in the filing of this document.
16
17
18

/s/ Jonathan H. Blavin
Jonathan H. Blavin

19

RT

26

ER

H

27
28

R NIA

n

M. Che

FO

dward
Judge E

NO

25

LI

24

ED
ORDER
S SOM. Chen
The HonorableT I
I Edward

A

23

UNIT
ED

22

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7/25
21 DATED: _______________, 2017

N

D IS T IC T
R

-4STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

OF

C

CASE. NO. 17-CV-03301-EMC