Meltonyan v. Jennings et al
Filing
12
ORDER granting 9 STIPULATION re 3 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. All previously set deadlines and the hearing set for 6/13/2017 at 4:00 p.m. are VACATED. All proceedings are stayed, with the exception that parties shall file a joint case management statement by 6/20/2017 advising as to the status of the case. A Case Management Conference is set for 6/27/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/13/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2017)
1 BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)
United States Attorney
2 SARA WINSLOW (DCBN 457643)
Chief, Civil Division
3 DAVID A. PEREDA (CABN 237982)
Assistant United States Attorney
4
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
5
Telephone: (415) 436-7298
Facsimile: (415) 436-6748
6
Email: David.Pereda@usdoj.gov
7
8 Attorney for Federal Defendants
DAVID JENNINGS, et al.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
KAREN MELTONYAN,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID JENNINGS, in his Official
Capacity, Sn Francisco Field Office
Director, Enforcement and Customs
Enforcement, et al.,
Defendants.
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C17-03361 WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
C17-03361 WHO
30
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, the parties hereby stipulate as follows:
1
2
3
Procedural History
4
1.
On July 9, 2017, Plaintiff Karen Meltonyan filed the Complaint for Declaratory and
5 Injunction relief in this action. ECF No. 1. On the same day, Mr. Meltonyan filed a Motion for
6 Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (“TRO application”). ECF No. 3. In that
7 motion, Mr. Meltonyan sought to stay the removal of Mr. Meltonyan’s spouse, Sona Stepanyan.
2.
8
On June 12, 2017, the Court set a briefing schedule and hearing date for the TRO
9 application. ECF No. 8. The government’s response is due by noon on July 13, 2017, and the hearing is
10 set for 4:00 p.m. on the same day.
3.
11
Meanwhile, the parties have been meeting and conferring on the case. With those efforts,
12 the parties are working towards a final resolution of the case.
13
14
Stay of Proceedings
15
4.
Given the anticipated resolution of this case, the parties agree to stay all further
16 proceedings. During the stay, no opposition to the TRO application or response to the complaint shall
17 be due.
18
5.
Accordingly, the parties also agree to vacate the briefing schedule and hearing date on
19 Mr. Meltonyan’s TRO application. The parties hope to be able to update the Court by June 26, 2017.
20
21
DATED: June 12, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
22
BRIAN J. STRETCH
United States Attorney
23
/s/ David Pereda
DAVID PEREDA
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
C17-03361 WHO
30
1
1 DATED: June 12, 2017
VAN DER HOUT, et al.
2
/s/ Zachary Nightingale
ZACH NIGHTINGALE
Attorney for Plaintiffs
3
4
*In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests under penalty of
5
perjury that each signatory has concurred in the filing of this document.
6
7
8
9
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court vacates the briefing schedule and hearing date that
10 it previously set forth in its Order at ECF No. 8. Further, the Court stays all proceedings pending the
11 resolution of this case. During the stay, no response is due to either Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary
12 Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (at ECF No. 3) or to Plaintiff’s Complaint (at ECF No. 1).
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17 Dated: June 13, 2017
18
19
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
C17-03361 WHO
30
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?