Meltonyan v. Jennings et al

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/08/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Zachary Nightingale (California Bar #184501) Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP 180 Sutter Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 981-3000 Facsimile: (415) 981-3003 Email: ndca@vblaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff Karen MELTONYAN 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Karen MELTONYAN, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. David JENNINGS, in his Official Capacity, San Francisco Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Thomas D. HOMAN, in his Official Capacity, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; and John F. KELLY, in his Official Capacity, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Defendants. Case No. 3:17-cv-03361-WHO ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AS MOOT Declaratory Judgment Act Case 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Dismiss No. 3:17-cv-03361-WHO ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 The Court, having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction as Moot, and good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS the Complaint and Motion DISMISSED AS MOOT, and the parties shall each bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: August 8, 2017 10 11 ____________________ William H. Orrick United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Dismiss No. 3:17-cv-03361-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?