Kennedy v. Columbus Manufacturing, Inc. et al
Filing
58
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Re 55 Parties' Joint Letter Brief Re Discovery Dispute. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
HAKAN KIP KENNEDY,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
Case No. 17-cv-03379-EMC
ORDER PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER
BRIEF RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
v.
COLUMBUS MANUFACTURING, INC.,
et al.,
Docket No. 55
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Defendants.
12
13
The parties have submitted a joint letter regarding a discovery dispute. Docket No. 55.
14
Plaintiff Hakan Kip Kennedy seeks materials beyond that produced by Defendants Columbus
15
Manufacturing, Inc., and Andrea Wilson in response to Mr. Kennedy’s request for production of
16
documents and interrogatories. Defendants object that Mr. Kennedy’s requests exceed the bounds
17
of Phase One of discovery, which is limited to materials pertaining to the validity or enforceability
18
of a severance agreement between Mr. Kennedy and Defendants. For example, Defendants object
19
to the request for communications between Columbus Manufacturing employees.
20
Mr. Kennedy has expressed his intent to argue for the rescission of the severance
21
agreement on theories of duress and undue influence. “Under California law, economic duress can
22
serve as a basis for invaliding a release or waiver.” Johnson v. Int’l Bus. Machs., 891 F. Supp.
23
522, 528 (N.D. Cal. 1995) (quoting U.S. for Use and Benefit of Reed v. Callahan, 885 F.2d 1180,
24
1184 (9th Cir. 1989)). The defendant’s knowledge of the plaintiff’s “economic exigencies” is an
25
element of economic duress. Id. at 530. Accordingly, Columbus Manufacturing’s internal
26
communications and records demonstrating knowledge of Mr. Kennedy’s economic exigencies are
27
relevant to Mr. Kennedy’s claims and discoverable under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of
28
Procedure. Defendants shall therefore PRODUCE materials requested by: Request for Production
1
of Documents, Nos. 1, 2, 8, 9, 10; Interrogatory Set 1, Nos. 3, 6, 10; and Interrogatories Set 2, No.
2
6. Production shall be limited to materials tending to demonstrate Defendants’ knowledge of Mr.
3
Kennedy’s economic status during negotiations regarding the severance agreement.
4
Mr. Kennedy’s other requests are DENIED as irrelevant to the validity and enforceability
5
of the severance agreement. Mr. Kennedy might make some of these requests in Phase Two, if his
6
suit reaches that stage.
7
This order disposes of Docket No. 55.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
13
Dated: January 26, 2018
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?