Kennedy v. Columbus Manufacturing, Inc. et al

Filing 58

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Re 55 Parties' Joint Letter Brief Re Discovery Dispute. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HAKAN KIP KENNEDY, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 Case No. 17-cv-03379-EMC ORDER PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE v. COLUMBUS MANUFACTURING, INC., et al., Docket No. 55 For the Northern District of California United States District Court Defendants. 12 13 The parties have submitted a joint letter regarding a discovery dispute. Docket No. 55. 14 Plaintiff Hakan Kip Kennedy seeks materials beyond that produced by Defendants Columbus 15 Manufacturing, Inc., and Andrea Wilson in response to Mr. Kennedy’s request for production of 16 documents and interrogatories. Defendants object that Mr. Kennedy’s requests exceed the bounds 17 of Phase One of discovery, which is limited to materials pertaining to the validity or enforceability 18 of a severance agreement between Mr. Kennedy and Defendants. For example, Defendants object 19 to the request for communications between Columbus Manufacturing employees. 20 Mr. Kennedy has expressed his intent to argue for the rescission of the severance 21 agreement on theories of duress and undue influence. “Under California law, economic duress can 22 serve as a basis for invaliding a release or waiver.” Johnson v. Int’l Bus. Machs., 891 F. Supp. 23 522, 528 (N.D. Cal. 1995) (quoting U.S. for Use and Benefit of Reed v. Callahan, 885 F.2d 1180, 24 1184 (9th Cir. 1989)). The defendant’s knowledge of the plaintiff’s “economic exigencies” is an 25 element of economic duress. Id. at 530. Accordingly, Columbus Manufacturing’s internal 26 communications and records demonstrating knowledge of Mr. Kennedy’s economic exigencies are 27 relevant to Mr. Kennedy’s claims and discoverable under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of 28 Procedure. Defendants shall therefore PRODUCE materials requested by: Request for Production 1 of Documents, Nos. 1, 2, 8, 9, 10; Interrogatory Set 1, Nos. 3, 6, 10; and Interrogatories Set 2, No. 2 6. Production shall be limited to materials tending to demonstrate Defendants’ knowledge of Mr. 3 Kennedy’s economic status during negotiations regarding the severance agreement. 4 Mr. Kennedy’s other requests are DENIED as irrelevant to the validity and enforceability 5 of the severance agreement. Mr. Kennedy might make some of these requests in Phase Two, if his 6 suit reaches that stage. 7 This order disposes of Docket No. 55. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 11 13 Dated: January 26, 2018 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?