Lopez v. Muniz
ORDER GRANTING IN PART 8 RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Judge William Alsup. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2018)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 17-03390 WHA
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
EXTENSION OF TIME
On February 5, respondent William Muniz requested a 60-day extension of time in
which to file a response to the order to show cause (Dkt. No. 8). Despite the fact that petitioner
Orlando Lopez is represented by counsel, respondent’s application states that petitioner is
representing himself, and for that reason he did not attempt to contact petitioner in connection
with this request. Petitioner, however, has not filed an objection to the requested extension.
Good cause appearing, respondent shall have until MARCH 29, 2018 to respond to the
order to show cause. If respondent files an answer, petitioner may file a traverse within
THIRTY DAYS of the date respondent’s answer is filed. If respondent files a motion to dismiss,
petitioner shall file an opposition (or statement of non-opposition) within THIRTY DAYS of the
date the motion is filed, and respondent shall file a reply within FIFTEEN DAYS of any
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 9, 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?