Lopez v. Muniz

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING IN PART 8 RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Judge William Alsup. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORLANDO LOPEZ,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM MUNIZ,

14

Respondent.
/

15
16

No. C 17-03390 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART
RESPONDENT’S
APPLICATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME

On February 5, respondent William Muniz requested a 60-day extension of time in

17

which to file a response to the order to show cause (Dkt. No. 8). Despite the fact that petitioner

18

Orlando Lopez is represented by counsel, respondent’s application states that petitioner is

19

representing himself, and for that reason he did not attempt to contact petitioner in connection

20

with this request. Petitioner, however, has not filed an objection to the requested extension.

21

Good cause appearing, respondent shall have until MARCH 29, 2018 to respond to the

22

order to show cause. If respondent files an answer, petitioner may file a traverse within

23

THIRTY DAYS of the date respondent’s answer is filed. If respondent files a motion to dismiss,

24

petitioner shall file an opposition (or statement of non-opposition) within THIRTY DAYS of the

25

date the motion is filed, and respondent shall file a reply within FIFTEEN DAYS of any

26

opposition.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 9, 2018.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE