The AASI Beneficiaries Trust, by and through Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee v. AVX Corporation et al
Filing
187
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #185 Extending the Deadline for Taitsu Corporation and Taitsu America, Inc. to File an Answer filed by Taitsu Corporation, Taitsu America, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/31/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jarod Bona (234327)
Aaron Gott (314264)
Bona Law PC
4275 Executive Square, Suite 200
La Jolla, CA 92037
(858) 964-4589
(858) 964-2301 (fax)
jarod.bona@bonalawpc.com
aaron.gott@bonalawpc.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Taitsu Corporation and Taitsu America, Inc.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
The AASI Beneficiaries’ Trust, by and
through Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating
Trustee,
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
17
AVX Corporation et al.,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B ONA L AW PC
BUSINESSJUSTICE.COM
Defendants.
Case No.: 3:17-cv-03472-EMC
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
Extending the Deadline for Taitsu
Corporation and Taitsu America, Inc. to
File an Answer
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Taitsu Corporation and Taitsu America,
2
Inc. (collectively, the “Stipulating Defendants”), and Plaintiff The AASI Beneficiaries’ Trust,
3
by and through Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee (“AASI”) respectfully request that the
4
Court enter the parties’ stipulation below that extends the time for each of the Stipulating
5
Defendants to file an answer to AASI’s Complaint (“Complaint”) (ECF No. 1).
6
FACTUAL BACKGROUND TO PARTIES’ STIPULATION
7
8
In support of this stipulation, the undersigned parties provide the following facts,
which are verified in the supporting Declaration of Aaron Gott filed concurrently herewith:
9
10
1.
On August 29, 2016, AASI filed a Complaint in the United States District
Court, Southern District of Florida. (ECF No. 1.)
11
2.
On December 29, 2016, the Court in the Southern District of Florida
12
ordered that Defendants respond to the Complaint within 45 days of the Court’s order on
13
Defendant’s motion to transfer this action to the United States District Court, Northern
14
District of California. (ECF No. 55.)
15
16
3.
that this action be transferred to the Northern District of California. (ECF No. 105.)
17
18
On June 14, 2017, the Court in the Southern District of Florida ordered
4.
On July 14, 2017, this action was reassigned to this Court from Magistrate
Judge Laurel Beeler. (ECF No. 137.)
19
5.
On July 20, 2017, an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases
20
Should Be Related (“Administrative Motion”) was filed in In re Capacitors Antitrust
21
Litigation, Master File No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD, requesting that this action be related to In
22
re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation and assigned to District Judge James Donato. (Master
23
File No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD, ECF No. 1757.) Other related cases have previously been
24
transferred to Judge Donato.
25
26
6.
is July 31, 2017.
27
28
The Stipulating Defendants’ current deadline to respond to the Complaint
7.
Counsel for the Stipulating Defendants have informed counsel for AASI
that the Stipulating Defendants will file an answer to the Complaint. AASI has therefore
B ONA L AW PC
BUSINESSJUSTICE.COM
1
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending
Deadline for Taitsu to File an Answer
Case No.: 3:17-cv-03472-EMC
1
agreed to extend the time for each of the Stipulating Defendants to file an answer to
2
September 29, 2017.
3
8.
The parties believe that the interests of judicial economy and efficiency will
4
be well served by extending the time for the Stipulating Defendants to file an answer to
5
the Complaint.
6
STIPULATION
7
In light of these facts, the undersigned parties jointly request that the Court enter
8
the following stipulation as an Order of the Court: The deadline for each of the Stipulating
9
Defendants to file an answer to the Complaint is extended to September 29, 2017.
10
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: July 28, 2017
BONA LAW PC
12
/s/ Aaron Gott
AARON GOTT
13
Jarod Bona
Aaron Gott
4275 Executive Square, Suite 200
La Jolla, CA 920370
(858) 964-4589
(858) 964-2301 (fax)
jarod.bona@bonalawpc.com
aaron.gott@bonalawpc.com
14
15
16
17
18
19
Attorneys for Defendants
Taitsu Corporation and Taitsu America, Inc.
20
21
DATED: July 28, 2017
BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE &
AXELROD LLP
22
/s/ Scott N. Wagner
SCOTT N. WAGNER
23
24
25
26
27
28
B ONA L AW PC
BUSINESSJUSTICE.COM
Robert W. Turken (admitted pro hac vice)
Scott N. Wagner (admitted pro hac vice)
Lori P. Lustrin (admitted pro hac vice)
1450 Brickell Ave., Suite 2300
Miami, Florida 33131-3456
(305) 374-7580
(305) 374-7593 (fax)
2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending
Deadline for Taitsu to File an Answer
Case No.: 3:17-cv-03472-EMC
rturken@bilzin.com
swagner@bilzin.com
llustrin@bilzin.com
1
2
3
ZELLE LLP
Judith A. Zahid
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 693-0700
(415) 693-0770 (fax)
jzahid@zelle.com
4
5
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff The AASI
Beneficiaries’ Trust, by and through
Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee
8
9
10
11
ECF ATTESTATION
12
I, Aaron Gott, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this
13
motion. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each of the
14
signatories has concurred in this filing.
15
DATED: July 28, 2017
BONA LAW PC
16
/s/ Aaron Gott
AARON GOTT
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B ONA L AW PC
BUSINESSJUSTICE.COM
3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending
Deadline for Taitsu to File an Answer
Case No.: 3:17-cv-03472-EMC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The Honorable Edward ERED
RD M. Chen
S SO O
UnitedIStates District Judge
TI
NO
7
RT
ER
9
10
A
H
8
en
d M. Ch
dwar
Judge E
FO
6
LI
5
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
7/31/17
Dated: ________________
RT
U
O
3
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B ONA L AW PC
BUSINESSJUSTICE.COM
1
[Proposed] Order
Case No.: 3:17-cv-03472-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?