Via Licensing Corporation v. Haier America Trading LLC

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 22 Setting Schedule on Response to Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/13/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

ROBERT J. BENSON (STATE BAR NO. 155971)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
2050 Main Street
Suite 1100
Irvine, CA 92614-8255
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
HAIER AMERICA TRADING, LLC

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VIA LICENSING CORPORATION,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
HAIER AMERICA TRADING, LLC,

15

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-03485
Judge Richard Seeborg – Courtroom 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE ON
RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
SCHEDULE ON RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
17-CV-03485
OHSUSA:767689797.1

1

WHEREAS, on June 15, 2017, plaintiff Via Licensing Corporation (“Via”) filed its

2

Complaint for Breach of Contract Seeking Damages and Specific Performance (Dkt. No. 1) (the

3

“Complaint”);

4

WHEREAS, on September 7, 2017, in-house counsel for defendant Haier America

5

Trading, LLC (“Haier”) contacted Via’s in-house counsel and the parties agreed that Haier’s time

6

to respond to the Complaint would be extended by sixty (60) days, which was granted by the

7

Court on September 14, 2017, making the response date November 13, 2017;

8
9

WHEREAS, on Saturday, November 11, 2016, Haier retained counsel in this matter,
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, to represent it in the above-captioned action;

10

WHEREAS, given the recent retention of Orrick in this action, Via has agreed to an

11

additional one-week extension of time for Haier to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint;

12

WHEREAS, Haier does not request any extension of other current deadlines in the action,

13
14
15
16
17

which will not be affected by this stipulation;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Via and
Haier, by and through their respective counsel, that:
1.

Defendant Haier shall have until and including November 20, 2017, to answer or

otherwise respond to the Complaint.

18
19
20

Dated: November 13, 2017

ROBERT J. BENSON
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

21
22

By:/s/ Robert J. Benson
ROBERT J. BENSON
Attorneys for Defendant
HAIER AMERICA TRADING, LLC

23
24
25
26
27
28

-1OHSUSA:767689797.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
SCHEDULE ON RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
17-CV-03485

1

Dated: November 13, 2017

LAURA KABLER OSWELL
ANTONIA STAMENOVA-DANCHEVA
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

2
3
4

By: /s/ Laura Kabler Oswell
LAURA KABLER OSWELL
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VIA LICENSING CORPORATION

5
6

Garrard R. Beeney
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10
11

*

12

*

*

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

13
DATED: November ____, 2017

15
_------------------------------------------------------------RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2OHSUSA:767689797.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
SCHEDULE ON RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
17-CV-03485