Miller v. Amazon.com, LLC

Filing 113

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 28, 2023. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2023)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-03488-MMC Document 113 Filed 02/28/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 COHELAN KHOURY & SINGER Isam C. Khoury (SBN 58759) ikhoury@ckslaw.com Michael D. Singer (SBN 115301) msinger@ckslaw.com 605 C Street, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: (619) 595-3001/Fax: (619) 595-3000 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON, APLC Ronald A. Marron (SBN 175650) ron@consumersadvocates.com 651 Arroyo Drive San Diego, CA 92103 Tel: (619) 696-9006/Fax: (619) 564-6665 Counsel for Plaintiff Jasmine Miller 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO JASMINE MILLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 500, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 17-CV-03488-MMC CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Complaint filed: Removal date: Trial Date: April 11, 2017 June 15, 2017 None set 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 17-CV-03488-MMC Case 3:17-cv-03488-MMC Document 113 Filed 02/28/23 Page 2 of 2 1 Based on the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Dismiss this action with prejudice, and good cause appearing 2 in support thereof, the Court dismisses this action in its entirety with prejudice. 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Dated: _________________, 2023 February 28 _____ ____ __ __ _____________ _ ____________ __ _ ________________________________ H Ho n. Maxine M. Chesney Hon. U it d St t M i t t JJudge d United States Magistrate 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 17-CV-03488-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?