Miller v. Amazon.com, LLC
Filing
113
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 28, 2023. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2023)
Case 3:17-cv-03488-MMC Document 113 Filed 02/28/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
COHELAN KHOURY & SINGER
Isam C. Khoury (SBN 58759)
ikhoury@ckslaw.com
Michael D. Singer (SBN 115301)
msinger@ckslaw.com
605 C Street, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: (619) 595-3001/Fax: (619) 595-3000
LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON, APLC
Ronald A. Marron (SBN 175650)
ron@consumersadvocates.com
651 Arroyo Drive
San Diego, CA 92103
Tel: (619) 696-9006/Fax: (619) 564-6665
Counsel for Plaintiff Jasmine Miller
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO
JASMINE MILLER, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMAZON.COM, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 500,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. 17-CV-03488-MMC
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
Complaint filed:
Removal date:
Trial Date:
April 11, 2017
June 15, 2017
None set
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 17-CV-03488-MMC
Case 3:17-cv-03488-MMC Document 113 Filed 02/28/23 Page 2 of 2
1
Based on the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Dismiss this action with prejudice, and good cause appearing
2
in support thereof, the Court dismisses this action in its entirety with prejudice.
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
Dated: _________________,
2023
February 28
_____
____
__
__
_____________
_ ____________
__
_
________________________________
H
Ho
n. Maxine M. Chesney
Hon.
U
it d St
t M
i t t JJudge
d
United
States
Magistrate
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 17-CV-03488-MMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?