Pariso v. Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 10

Order by Hon. William Alsup denying 9 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 VICTOR PARISO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, No. C 17-03557 WHA Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 v. THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. Defendants. / 16 17 ORDER DENYING STIPULATION The parties stipulated dismissal provides, among other things, that the Court will retain 18 jurisdiction of the action solely for the purpose of determining plaintiff’s fee application, and 19 will set a briefing schedule to resolve any fee dispute that arises. Our Civil Local Rules provide 20 the procedures to move for fees, and the Court will not deviate from these rules. Therefore, the 21 stipulation and proposed order is DENIED. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 26, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?