Baranco v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filing 87

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #86 Stipulated Protective Order filed by Anita Farrell, Roger Kinnunen, Donald Brown, James Abbitt, Gary Kubber, Malisa Nicolau, Daniel Caron, David Baranco, John Furno, Harriet Abruscato, James Jenkin. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/19/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON, LLP TIMOTHY G. BLOOD (149343) LESLIE E. HURST (178432) CAMILLE S. BASS (297609) 501 West Broadway, Suite 1490 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619/338-1100 619/338-1101 (fax) tblood@bholaw.com lhurst@bholaw.com cbass@bholaw.com McCUNE WRIGHT AREVALO LLP JOSEPH G. SAUDER MATTHEW D. SCHELKOPF (pro hac vice) JOSEPH B. KENNEY 555 Lancaster Avenue Berwyn, PA 19312 Tel: 610/200-0581 jgs@mccunewright.com mds@mccunewright.com jbk@mccunewright.com 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 13 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLC TAMARA A. BUSH (197153) 333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: 213-457-1800 Fax: 213-457-1850 tbush@dykema.com JOHN M. THOMAS (266842) DAVID M. GEORGE, Pro Hac Vice 2723 South State Street, Suite 400 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Tel: 734/214-7613 Fax: 734-214-7696 jthomas@dykema.com dgeorge@dykema.com MCAFEE & TAFT SHERRY A. ROZELL, Pro Hac Vice Two W. Second Street, Suite 1100 Williams Center Tower II Tulsa, OK 74103 Tel: 918-587-0001 Fax: 918-574-3101 sherry.rozell@mcafeetaft.com Additional counsel listed on signature page 14 Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Co. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 19 20 Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC Plaintiffs, 18 DAVID BARANCO, JAMES ABBITT, HARRIET ABRUSCATO, DONALD BROWN, DANIEL CARON, ANITA FARRELL, JOHN FURNO, JAMES JENKIN, ROGER KINNUNEN, GARY KUBBER and MALISA NICOLAU individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, District Judge Edward M. Chen Courtroom 5, 17th Floor [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CLASS ACTION 21 22 v. 23 24 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, 25 Defendant. Comp. Filed: June 21, 2017 Trial Date: Not Yet Set JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 26 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 00132928 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 To expedite the flow of discovery material, facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes 2 over confidentiality, adequately protect material entitled to be kept confidential, and ensure 3 that protection is afforded only to material so entitled, Plaintiffs and Defendant (the “Parties”), 4 by and through their respective counsel, and pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of 5 Civil Procedure, HEREBY STIPULATE that: 6 1. Parties to the Protective Order. This Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”) 7 shall govern, for pretrial purposes only, the Parties in the above-captioned action (the 8 “Action”). All references to “Party” or “Designating Party” throughout this Order are intended 9 to include non-parties who agree to be bound by this Order. 10 2. Scope of Order. This Order is intended to facilitate the Parties’ production of 11 certain information and documents as part of voluntary disclosure and in response to discovery 12 requests. Nothing in this Order is to be construed to expand or limit the Parties’ discovery 13 obligations. This Order covers the production and use of all Protected Documents in this 14 action that constitute, contain, or disclose, in whole or in part, information which the 15 Designating Party designates as “Confidential.” This Order is also intended to apply to any 16 documents produced to the Parties by a non-party in connection with a subpoena. Nothing in 17 this Order will prevent counsel from using Confidential Information in connection with any 18 work product created by or on behalf of that counsel. 19 9 and 15 herein, such work product may be retained by the counsel creating it. 20 21 22 3. Subject to the provisions of paragraphs General Definitions. For purposes of this Order, the following terms have the following meanings: a. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G) and Cal. Civ. Code §§ 3426, et 23 24 development, or commercially sensitive business information, the disclosure of which would 25 cause competitive harm, that is contained in Protected Documents, and which have not been 26 disclosed or made available to the public. Confidential Information may include, but is not 27 limited to: (1) engineering documents, including design drawings and other technical 28 00132928 seq., “Confidential Information” shall mean trade secrets or other confidential research, engineering related specifications; (2) test documents, analysis, and testing procedures; Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 (3) manufacturing specifications and procedures, including communications with and process 2 documents pertaining to Ford’s suppliers and supplier relationships; (4) internal business or 3 financial information; (5) confidential customer information and personally identifiable 4 information; and (6) any other similar proprietary, confidential, private information, 5 commercially sensitive business information, or competitive intelligence, including but not 6 limited to, trade secrets. Confidential Information shall not include information that has been 7 publicly disclosed by any Party prior to the date hereof, or that has been or is as of the date 8 hereto generally available to the public, or that becomes generally available to the public after 9 the date hereof, other than as a result of disclosure by the Non-Designating Party. 10 11 12 13 14 “Customer” shall mean any person or entity that purchases or otherwise b. comes to possess Defendant’s product. “Designating Party” shall mean the Party or non-party designating c. Discovery Material as “Confidential.” “Discovery Materials” shall mean and include, without limitation, d. 15 Documents, including Electronically Stored Information (ESI), responses to interrogatories, 16 requests for admissions, or other discovery requests, physical objects, samples, CD-ROMs, 17 tapes or other items, deposition transcripts and exhibits thereto, and information provided by or 18 on behalf of the Parties or any non-party witness pursuant to subpoena or otherwise in the 19 course of discovery. 20 e. “Document” shall mean and include, without limitation, all written 21 material, videotapes, and all other tangible items, produced in whatever format (e.g., hard 22 copy, electronic, digital, etc.) and on whatever media (e.g., hard copy, videotape, computer 23 diskette, CD-ROM, DVD, hard drive, or otherwise) defined as permitted under 24 Fed. R. Civ. P. 34. 25 f. “Party” or “Parties” shall mean and include the parties to this litigation. 26 g. “Pleadings” shall mean and include, without limitation, all papers, 27 motions, briefs, affidavits, declarations, exhibits, etc., filed with the Court. 28 00132928 Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 2 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 h. “Protected Documents” shall mean documents and materials to be produced in this litigation which contain Confidential Information. 4. Designating Confidential Information. a. All designations of Confidential Information shall be made in good faith by the Designating Party and made at the time of disclosure, production, or tender. b. The designation of Confidential Information may be made by marking 7 or placing the applicable notice “Subject to Protective Order,” “Confidential,” or substantially 8 similar notice on media containing the documents, on the document itself, or on a copy of the 9 document, in such a way that it does not obscure the text or other content of the document. 10 The parties recognize that native-format documents cannot be stamped with a confidential 11 designation on the document itself; thus, to the extent native-format documents are produced, 12 the producing Party will make reasonable efforts to identify native-format documents in a 13 manner so that it is clear that they are designated as confidential under this protective order 14 (e.g., slip sheets, file name, on the media containing the document, etc.). 15 c. Any document or any information designated as “Subject to Protective 16 Order,” “Confidential,” or similar language in accordance with the provisions of this Order 17 shall only be used, shown, or disclosed as provided in this Order. 18 d. The burden of proving that a Protected Document contains Confidential 19 Information is on the Designating Party. Prior to designating any material as “Confidential,” 20 the Designating Party must make a bona fide determination that the material is, in fact, a trade 21 secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information subject to 22 protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G). 23 e. If a Party disagrees with the “Confidential” designation of any Protected 24 25 good faith in an effort to resolve any dispute concerning such designation or redaction. The 26 Parties shall follow the procedures set forth in Civil Local Rule 37-1 and the Court’s Civil 27 Standing Order on Discovery to resolve whether the Confidential Information should be 28 00132928 Document, the Party will so notify the Designating Party in writing. Counsel shall confer in treated as “Confidential.” If the objection cannot be resolved by agreement, the Designating Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 3 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Party shall initiate the process for filing a joint letter pursuant to the Court’s Civil Standing 2 Order on Discovery within thirty (30) days after counsel have concluded that no agreement can 3 be reached. The document or information whose “Confidential” designation or redaction is 4 objected to shall continue to be treated as “Confidential,” as applicable, until the motion has 5 been decided by the Court. 6 Personally Identifying Information (“PII”) of Ford customers contained f. 7 in documents produced by Ford shall be treated as “Confidential” as outlined in this Order. 8 The Parties continue to meet and confer regarding whether Ford can redact PII from the 9 documents produced to Plaintiffs, the use of PII contained in responsive documents to contact 10 absent class members prior to the Court determining whether a class can be certified, whether 11 any limitations should apply to any such communications, and whether any disclosures should 12 be made in connection with any such communications. 13 14 5. Use and Disclosure of Protected Documents. a. Protected Documents and any copies thereof received pursuant to this 15 Protective Order shall be maintained Confidential by the receiving party, his/her attorney, 16 other representatives, and expert witnesses, and shall be used only for purposes of this action, 17 subject to the limitations set forth herein. The persons or entities identified in Paragraph 18 4(b)(i)-(ix) below to whom Protected Documents are disclosed pursuant to this Order shall 19 keep all such materials and information, and any copies, notes, extracts, summaries, or 20 descriptions of such material, within their exclusive possession and control, shall treat all such 21 copies, notes, extracts, summaries, or descriptions of the Protected Documents or any portion 22 thereof as Confidential, shall take all necessary and prudent measures to maintain the 23 confidentiality of all such materials or information, and shall not disseminate such Protected 24 Documents other than in accordance with this Order. Protected Documents shall be disclosed only to “Qualified Persons.” 25 b. 26 Qualified Persons are limited to: 27 The Court and its personnel; 28 00132928 i. ii. The Parties to this litigation; Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 4 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 iii. Counsel of record in this litigation, as well as paralegals, 2 technical, administrative, and clerical employees working under 3 the direct supervision of such counsel; 4 iv. Experts and non-attorney consultants retained by the Parties for 5 the preparation or trial of this case, provided that no disclosure 6 shall be made to any expert or consultant who is currently 7 employed by an automobile manufacturer competitor of Ford; 8 v. A potential, anticipated, or actual fact witness whom counsel for 9 the disclosing Party believes in good faith is likely to have 10 knowledge pertaining to the content of the Protected Documents 11 to be disclosed; 12 vi. The author(s) or any recipient of the document; 13 vii. Litigation support consultants and vendors who provide 14 litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, electronic 15 discovery, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 16 demonstrations, etc.); 17 viii. 18 testimony; and 19 ix. 20 21 Court reporters recording and/or transcribing deposition Any person expressly named and agreed to in writing by the Parties or by further Order of the Court. c. While the Parties may provide Protected Documents in accordance with 22 the provisions of this Protective Order in an electronic form, such documents may not be 23 posted on any website or internet accessible document repository that is accessible to anyone 24 other than “Qualified Persons” listed above. 25 d. All persons described in Paragraph 4(b)(i)-(ix) above shall not under 26 27 and the Confidential information contained therein or the fact that such persons have obtained 28 00132928 any circumstance sell, offer for sale, advertise, or publicize either the Protected Documents Protected Documents and Confidential Information. Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 5 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 e. All persons described in Paragraphs 4(b)(iv), (v), and (ix) above shall 2 not have access to Protected Documents without having first read, acknowledged, and agreed 3 to be bound by this Order by executing the Agreement to be Bound attached as Exhibit A (the 4 “Agreement to Be Bound”). 5 f. Each Party’s counsel shall retain each executed Agreement to Be Bound 6 and a list of Protected Documents disclosed to each person who signed an Agreement to Be 7 Bound. Each executed Agreement to Be Bound shall not be made available to the Designating 8 Party during the pendency of the litigation but shall, along with the list of Protected 9 Documents disclosed, be available for an in camera inspection by the Court if good cause for 10 review is demonstrated by the Designating Party. During the pendency of the litigation or 11 after the termination of the litigation, subject to the attorney work product doctrine/attorney- 12 client privilege and for good cause shown, the Court may order any party to provide to the 13 Designated Party any executed Agreement to Be Bound. 14 g. Stipulation to and entry of this Protective Order does not prohibit a 15 party from seeking entry of a separate order, if warranted, governing documents identified and 16 designated as Highly Confidential which would be disclosed only to persons described in 17 Paragraphs 4(b)(iii), (iv), (vi), (vii), and (ix) and members of the in-house legal departments 18 for the Parties to this litigation or their parents or affiliates, including their paralegals, 19 investigative, technical, secretarial, and clerical personnel who are engaged in assisting them 20 in this litigation. 21 6. 22 Designation of Deposition Testimony. a. Deposition testimony that counsel for the Party or non-party witness 23 tendering such testimony, in good faith, believes refers to Protected Documents or information 24 obtained therefrom shall be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” as applicable, by such counsel 25 by making a statement on the record for inclusion in the deposition transcript or, in writing, 26 within twenty-one (21) calendar days after receipt of the transcript. 27 28 00132928 b. When Protected Documents or information obtained therefrom is designated as “Confidential” in a deposition transcript, the counsel making the designation Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 6 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 shall instruct the reporter to imprint the legend “THIS TRANSCRIPT CONTAINS 2 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” on the cover page of the transcript and to include, at the 3 front of the transcript, a page identifying all pages and lines designated “CONFIDENTIAL” in 4 the transcript. 5 c. To the extent that Protected Documents or information obtained 6 therefrom are used in the taking of depositions and/or used as exhibits at trial, such documents 7 or information shall remain subject to the provisions of this Order, along with the transcript 8 pages and lines of the deposition testimony and/or trial testimony dealing with the Protected 9 Documents or information. 10 d. Any court reporter or transcriber who reports or transcribes testimony in 11 this action shall agree that all Confidential Information designated as such under this Order 12 shall remain Confidential and shall not be disclosed by them, except pursuant to the terms of 13 this Order, and that any notes or transcriptions of such testimony (and any accompanying 14 exhibits) will be retained by the reporter or delivered to counsel of record. 15 7. Filing Under Seal. If any party wishes to file or lodge Protected Documents, 16 17 Court, that party must seek to file under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) and serve 18 the Designating Party on the same day with a copy of the declaration identifying the 19 documents or portions that contain designated confidential material. 20 Within four (4) days of this notification, the Designating Party must file a responsive 21 declaration under Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A) to establish that the material is sealable. 22 Pending determination of the motion, the lodged document(s) will be conditionally under seal. 23 Until such time as the Court issues an order sealing the Protected Documents, the party 24 seeking to use the Protected Documents may refer only to a redacted version. Upon granting 25 of an order sealing the record, the Protected Documents will be sealed and labeled by the court 26 clerk and treated according to Civil Local Rule 79-5(g). Upon denial of such an order, the 27 documents may be filed in the public record no earlier than four (4) days and no later than ten 28 00132928 portions of Protected Documents, or information taken from Protected Documents with the (10) days after the motion is denied. Civil L.R. 79-5(e)(2). Civil L.R. 79-5(e). Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 7 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 8. Return and Destruction of Protected Documents. Within ninety (90) days 2 after the conclusion of this case, upon request of the Designating Party, counsel for the Party 3 who has received Protected Documents shall either: (a) return to the Designating Party the 4 Protected Documents, including any documents which any such Party disclosed to any 5 Qualified Person, or (b) securely destroy the Protected Documents, including any documents 6 which any such Party disclosed to any Qualified Person, and certify in writing such destruction 7 to the Designating Party. 8 9 9. Inadvertent Production. a. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents or information 10 containing information which should have been designated as Confidential shall not be deemed 11 a waiver in whole or in part of the Party’s claims of confidentiality. 12 inadvertently or unintentionally produced information which should have been designated as 13 Confidential, the producing Party will notify the receiving Party within ten (10) days of 14 discovery of the inadvertent production and request that the Confidential designation be 15 applied to such documents or information. If a receiving party objects to the producing Party’s 16 Confidentiality designation, it will notify the producing Party of its objections in writing within 17 seven (7) business days of receipt of the notification described above, and the Parties shall 18 proceed in accordance with paragraph 3(e) to resolve the dispute. Pending the Court’s ruling, a 19 receiving Party agrees to maintain the documents as Confidential under the terms of this Order. 20 If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or 21 items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under 22 this agreement for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation by advising all other 23 Parties in writing and by producing replacement documents or material with the “Confidential” 24 designation as described above, the receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to ensure that 25 the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this agreement. 26 b. If a Party has Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of a privileged or work- 27 28 00132928 product-protected document, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. For example, Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 8 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 the mere production of privileged or work-product-protected documents in this case as part of 2 a mass production is not itself a waiver in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. 3 4 5 10. Right to Use Own Information. Nothing in this Order shall limit any Party’s right to disclose to any person, or use for any purpose, its own information and Documents. 11. Subpoena or Order. If a Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in 6 other litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this 7 action as Confidential, counsel for the receiving Party must promptly notify counsel for the 8 Designating Party in writing, and in no event, more than five (5) business days after receiving 9 the subpoena or order. Counsel for the receiving Party also must inform, in writing, the Party 10 who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material 11 covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Order. 12 12. Non-Party Discovery. Any documents or information produced by a non- 13 party witness in discovery in the action pursuant to subpoena or otherwise may be designated 14 by such non-party as “Confidential” under the terms of this Order, and such designation shall 15 have the same force and effect, and create the same duties, obligations, and remedies as if 16 made by one of the Parties hereto. 17 18 13. Submissions to Regulatory Agencies or Governmental Entitles. a. This Stipulated Protective Order shall not be construed to prohibit 19 Ford’s disclosure or production of safety-related information to a regulatory agency or 20 governmental entity with an interest in the safety-related information. Material subject to this 21 Order may only be disclosed to a regulatory agency or governmental entity with an interest in 22 the safety-related information by Ford, and such disclosure shall be made pursuant to 23 49 C.F.R. 512 or similar applicable rules. 24 b. If other parties to this Order have a reasonable belief that certain 25 26 entity, they are not prohibited from advising the regulatory agency or governmental entity that 27 they believe such documents were produced in this case, however, any disclosure of such 28 00132928 documents are safety-related and need to be disclosed to a regulatory agency or governmental documents shall adhere to the procedure described in Paragraph 12(a). Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 9 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 14. Modification. This Protective Order may not be waived, modified, abandoned 2 or terminated, in whole or part, except by an instrument in writing signed by the Parties or 3 pursuant to further Court Order. If any provision of this Protective Order shall be held invalid 4 for any reason whatsoever, the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby. 5 15. 6 Duration. a. After termination of this litigation, the provisions of this Order shall 7 continue to be binding. This Court retains and shall have jurisdiction over the Parties and 8 recipients of the Protected Documents for enforcement of the provisions of this Order 9 following termination of this litigation. 10 b. This Protective Order shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, upon 11 their attorneys, and upon the Parties’ and their attorneys’ successors, executors, personal 12 representatives, administrators, heirs, legal representatives, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, 13 employees, agents, independent contractors, or other persons or organizations over which they 14 have control. 15 16 17 Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 19, 2018 BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON, LLP TIMOTHY G. BLOOD (149343) LESLIE E. HURST (178432) CAMILLE S. BASS (297609) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00132928 By: s/ Leslie E. Hurst LESLIE E. HURST 501 West Broadway, Suite 1490 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619/338-1100 619/338-1101 (fax) tblood@bholaw.com lhurst@bholaw.com cbass@bholaw.com McCUNE WRIGHT AREVALO LLP JOSEPH G. SAUDER MATTHEW D. SCHELKOPF (pro hac vice) JOSEPH B. KENNEY 555 Lancaster Avenue Berwyn, PA 19312 Tel: 610/200-0581 jgs@mccunewright.com Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 10 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 mds@mccunewright.com jbk@mccunewright.com 2 McCUNE WRIGHT AREVALO LLP RICHARD D. McCUNE (132124) DAVID C. WRIGHT (177468) 3281 East Guasti Road, Suite 100 Ontario, CA 91761 Tel: 909/557-1250 909/557-1275 (fax) rdm@mccunewright.com dcw@mccunewright.com 3 4 5 6 7 BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. BEN BARNOW (pro hac vice) ERICH P. SCHORK (pro hac vice) 1 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602 Tel: 312/621-2000 312/641-5504 (fax) b.barnow@barnowlaw.com e.schork@barnowlaw.com 8 9 10 11 12 THE COFFMAN LAW FIRM RICHARD L. COFFMAN (pro hac vice) First City Building 505 Orleans St., Fifth Floor Beaumont, TX 77701 Tel: 409/833-7700 866/835-8250 (fax) rcoffman@coffmanlawfirm.com 13 14 15 16 17 THE DAVENPORT LAW FIRM LLC COURTNEY L. DAVENPORT (pro hac vice) 18805 Porterfield Way Germantown, MD 20874 Tel: 703/901-1660 courtney@thedavenportlawfirm.com 18 19 20 THE MILLER LAW FIRM. P.C. E. POWELL MILLER (P39487) SHARON S. ALMONRODE (P33938) DENNIS A. LIENHARDT (P81118) 950 W. University Dr., Suite 300 Rochester, MI 48307 Tel: 248/841-2200 248/652-2852 (fax) epm@millerlawpc.com ssa@millerlawpc.com dal@millerlawpc.com 21 22 23 24 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 27 28 00132928 /// Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 11 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Dated: March 19, 2018 2 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLC JOHN M. THOMAS (266842) DAVID M. GEORGE (pro hac vice) 3 By: 4 5 2723 South State Street, Suite 400 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Tel: 734/214-7613 734/214-7696 (fax) jthomas@dykema.com dgeorge@dykema.com 6 7 8 TAMARA A. BUSH (197153) 333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: 213/457-1800 213/457-1850 (fax) tbush@dykema.com 9 10 11 12 McAFEE & TAFT SHERRY A. ROZELL (pro hac vice) Two W. Second Street, Suite 1100 Williams Center Tower II Tulsa, OK 74103 Tel: 918/587-0001 918/574-3101 (fax) sherry.rozell@mcafeetaft.com 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Co. 17 ECF CERTIFICATION 18 19 s/ David M. George DAVID M. GEORGE The filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this 20 document from the signatories to this document. 21 Dated: March 19, 2018 22 23 BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON, LLP By: s/ Leslie E. Hurst LESLIE E. HURST 24 25 26 27 28 00132928 Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 12 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Having reviewed the above Stipulated Protective Order, and finding good cause exists, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Protective Order be entered as an order of this 4 Court. 12 S ER R NIA n M. Che FO dward Judge E H 11 RT 10 O IT IS S NO 9 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES ERED ORD DISTRICT JUDGE LI 8 3/19/2018 UNIT ED 7 Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. A 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00132928 Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 13 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 DAVID BARANCO, JAMES ABBITT, HARRIET ABRUSCATO, DONALD BROWN, DANIEL CARON, ANITA FARRELL, JOHN FURNO, JAMES JENKIN, ROGER KINNUNEN, GARY KUBBER and MALISA NICOLAU individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND (EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER) 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 17 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00132928 1 EXHIBIT A Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 1 AFFIDAVIT OF _______________________________________, being duly sworn 2 and personally appearing before the undersigned attesting officer, duly authorized by law to 3 administer oaths, deposes and says that the within statements are true and correct: 4 5 6 1. I have read the Stipulated Protective Order attached hereto, and I understand its terms and meanings. 2. I agree that my signature below submits me to the jurisdiction of the United 7 States District Court Northern District of California in the above-captioned case and binds me 8 to the provisions of the Stipulated Protective Order, including to all promises undertaken in the 9 Order, as if originally agreed by me. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00132928 2 EXHIBIT A Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 1 Further Affiant sayeth not. 2 This ______ day of ____________________, 20___. 3 4 AFFIANT 5 6 7 8 9 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ___ day of _________________, _____. ____________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 10 Name:_______________________________ 11 12 No.:_________________________________ My Commission Expires:_________________ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 00132928 3 EXHIBIT A Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on March 19, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 3 Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 4 e-mail addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I have 5 mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non- 6 CM/ECF participants indicated on the Electronic Mail Notice List. 7 8 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 19, 2018. 9 10 11 12 13 14 s/ Leslie E. Hurst LESLIE E. HURST BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON, LLP 501 West Broadway, Suite 1490 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619/338-1100 619/338-1101 (fax) lhurst@bholaw.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-03580-EMC 00132928 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?