Baranco v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filing
90
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #89 FILING ANSWER filed by Ford Motor Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/21/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2018)
1 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLC
Tamara A. Bush (197153)
2 tbush@dykema.com
333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3100
3 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 457-1800
(213) 457-1850
4 Facsimile:
5 DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC
John M. Thomas (266842,)
6 David M. George – Pro Hac Vice
jthomas@dykema.com
7 dgeorge@dykema.com
2723 South State Street, Suite 400
8 Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Telephone: (734) 214-7613
(734) 214-7696
9 Facsimile:
10 McAFEE & TAFT
2723 SOUTH STATE STREET
SUITE 400
ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
Sherry A. Rozell, Pro Hac Vice
11 Sherry.rozell@mcafeetaft.com
Two W. Second Street, Suite 1100
12 Williams Center Tower II
Tulsa, OK 74103
13 Telephone: (918) 587-0001
Facsimile: (918) 574-3101
14
Attorneys for Defendant
15 FORD MOTOR COMPANY
16
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
DAVID BARANCO, JAMES ABBITT,
Case No. 3:17-CV-03580-EMC
20 FARRELL, JOHN FURNO, JAMES
BROWN, DANIEL CARON, ANITA
Assigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen,
Courtroom 5 – San Francisco
21 KUBBER and MALISA NICOLAU,
CLASS ACTION
19 HARRIET ABRUSCATO, DONALD
JENKIN, ROGER KINNUNEN, GARY
individually and on behalf of all others
22 similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
23
24
vs.
25 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation;
26
27
28
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING FILING AN
ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
[L.R. 6-1(A)]
Complaint Filed: June 21, 2017
1st Amend Complaint: August 18, 2017
Trial Date:
November 4, 2019
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING AN ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)]
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580
1
Plaintiffs and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Ford”) (collectively
2 the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
3
WHEREAS, on March 12, 2018, the Court entered an Order Granting In Part
4 and Denying In Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended
5 Complaint. Pursuant to that Order Plaintiffs have 30 days to file an amended
6 complaint.
7
WHEREAS, during the Further Case Management Conference held on
8 March 15, 2018, Plaintiffs’ counsel advised the Court and Ford that they will be filing
9 a Second Amended Class Action Complaint on or before April 11, 2018.
WHEREAS, upon stipulation of the parties, it is agreed that Ford will not file
11 an Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint but instead will file a response to
2723 SOUTH STATE STREET
SUITE 400
ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
10
12 Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3);
13
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant, as the filer of this document, attests that
14 concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other
15 signatories:
16
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT:
17
1.
Ford will not file an Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint but
18 instead will file a response to Plaintiffs’ to-be filed Second Amended Complaint in
19 accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
20 Dated: March 21, 2018
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLC
21
By: /s/ Tamara A. Bush
David M. George (admitted pro hac vice)
John M. Thomas
Tamara A. Bush
Attorneys for Defendant
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
22
23
24
25 Dated: March 21, 2018
BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON LLP
26
By: /s/ Leslie E. Hurst
Timothy G. Blood
Leslie E. Hurst
Attorneys for Plaintiff
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING AN ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)]
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is
3 GRANTED. The Court Orders that:
4
1.
Ford is not required to file an Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended
5 Complaint.
6
2.
Once filed, Ford will respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint
7 in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
UNIT
ED
15
16
FO
LI
ER
H
14
en
d M. Ch
dwar
Judge E
A
13
R NIA
12
RT
2723 SOUTH STATE STREET
SUITE 400
ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
11
By: ________________________________
HON. EDWARD RED
RDEM. CHEN
S S STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITEDO O
IT I
NO
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
3/21/18
10 DATED:________________
RT
U
O
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING AN ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)]
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?