Baranco v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filing 99

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #98 Regarding Plaintiffs' Third Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Ford Motor Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/24/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 DAVID BARANCO, JAMES ABBITT, HARRIET ABRUSCATO, DONALD 12 BROWN, DANIEL CARON, ANITA FARRELL, JOHN FURNO, JAMES 13 JENKIN, GARY KUBBER and MALISA NICOLAU, APRIL NICOLO, 14 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, vs. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a 18 Delaware corporation; 19 Defendants. Case No. 3:17-CV-03580-EMC Assigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen, Courtroom 5 – San Francisco CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-1(A)] Complaint Filed: 1st Amend Complaint: 2nd Amend Complaint: Trial Date: June 21, 2017 August 18, 2017 April 11, 2018 None 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)] CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580 1 Plaintiffs and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Ford”) (collectively 2 the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS, Ford’s response to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action 4 Complaint is due on May 23, 2018; 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have informed Ford that they would like to amend their 6 complaint to add three named plaintiffs and have asked Ford whether it will consent 7 to them filing a Third Amended Class Action Complaint to add such plaintiffs; 8 WHEREAS, Ford has consented to Plaintiffs’ request to file a Third Amended 9 Class Action Complaint to add three named plaintiffs; 10 WHEREAS, as part of the parties’ agreement that Plaintiffs may file a Third 11 Amended Class Action Complaint to add three named plaintiffs, Plaintiffs agreed to 12 (1) allege, for all named Plaintiffs, the Vehicle Identification Number for each 13 plaintiff’s vehicle and the date each plaintiff purchased his or her vehicle; and 14 (2) waive all arguments that the filing date of the new plaintiffs relates back to the 15 date of the filing of the original complaint (i.e., the filing date of the new plaintiffs’ 16 claims shall be the date the Third Amended Complaint is filed); 17 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs agree to file their Third Amended Complaint by 18 May 31, 2018; and 19 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs agree that Ford need not file a response to the Second 20 Amended Complaint and that its response to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint 21 shall be filed by June 21, 2018; 22 WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant, as the filer of this document, attests that 23 concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other 24 signatories: 25 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT: 26 1. 27 28 Plaintiffs agree to file their Third Amended Complaint by May 31, 2018; and 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)] CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580 1 2. Ford need not file a response to the Second Amended Complaint and 2 that its response to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint shall be filed 3 by June 21, 2018. 4 Dated: May 23, 2018 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLC 5 By: /s/ Tamara A. Bush David M. George (admitted pro hac vice) John M. Thomas Tamara A. Bush Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: May 23, 2018 MCCUNE WRIGHT AREVALO LLP 11 By: 12 /s/ Matthew D. Schelkopf Matthew D. Schelkopf Attorney for Plaintiffs . 13 14 Ford need not file a response to the Second Amended Complaint; and 3. Ford’s response to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint shall be filed by June 21, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 28 Judg ER H 27 By: ________________________________ HON. EDWARD M. CHEN n M. Che UNITED STATESdDISTRICT JUDGE e Edwar RT 26 DERED O OR IT IS S NO 25 5/24/18 DATED:________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 21 2. R NIA 20 Plaintiffs shall file their Third Amended Complaint by May 31, 2018; FO 19 1. LI 18 GRANTED. The Court Orders that: A 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is S 16 [PROPOSED] ORDER UNIT ED 15 N F D IS T IC T O R C 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)] CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?