Moralez v. Wehab et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 extending deadline to complete joint site inspection. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/4/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2017)
1
2
3
4
Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
E-mail: service@mission.legal
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Francisca Moralez
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
BISHARA WEHAB, as Trustee of the
)
)
WEHAB 2004 REVOCABLE TRUST
AGREEMENT dated September 1, 2004, and )
)
dba COUNTRY CORNER; NADIA WEHAB, )
Trustee of the WEHAB 2004 REVOCABLE )
TRUST AGREEMENT dated September 1, )
)
2004;
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
FRANCISCA MORALEZ,
No. 3:17-cv-03582-RS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE
INSPECTION REQUIRED BY GENERAL
ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
Plaintiff, Francisca Moralez (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Nadia Wehab, Trustee of the
2
Wehab 2004 Revocable Trust Agreement dated September 1, 2004 (“Defendant,” and together
3
with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as
4
follows:
5
1.
This action arises out of Plaintiff’s claims that Defendant denied her full and
6
equal access to their public accommodation on account of her disabilities in violation of Title
7
III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and parallel California law. Plaintiff seeks
8
injunctive relief under federal and California law, as well as damages under California law.
9
This matter therefore proceeds under this district’s General Order 56 which governs ADA
10
access matters.
11
2.
12
subject property on or before October 4, 2017 (Dkt. 4).
3.
13
14
4.
The Parties have agreed to conduct the joint site inspection on October 5, 2017 at
1:30 p.m. unless a settlement is reached prior to that date.
5.
17
18
Counsel for the Parties is unavailable to conduct the joint site inspection prior to
the October 4, 2017 deadline.
15
16
The Court has ordered that the Parties conduct a joint site inspection of the
Accordingly, the Parties stipulate to extend the deadline to conduct the joint site
inspection to October 5, 2017.
19
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
22
Dated: October 4, 2017
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
23
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Francisca Moralez
24
25
26
///
27
///
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
1
Dated: October 4, 2017
/s/ Brandon F. Douglass
Brandon F. Douglass
Attorneys for Defendant,
Nadia Wehab, Trustee of the Wehab 2004 Revocable
Trust Agreement dated September 1, 2004
2
3
4
5
ATTESTATION
6
7
Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s)
whose electronic signature is attributed above.
8
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Francisca Moralez
9
10
11
12
ORDER
13
14
15
16
17
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Parties to complete the joint site
inspection is extended to October 5, 2017, with all dates triggered by that deadline continued
accordingly.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated: 10/4/17
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED BY
GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?