Power Rental Asset Co Two, LLC v. Forge Group Power Pty Ltd
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 47 Regarding Deadline to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/11/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
POWER RENTAL ASSET CO TWO, LLC,
Case No.: 3:17-CV-03621-RS
Assigned to Hon. Richard Seeborg
Complaint Filed: 6/21/2017
Complaint Removed: 06/23/2017
FORGE GROUP POWER PTY LTD (In
Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed),
MARK MENTHA and SCOTT LANGDON of
KordaMentha Pty Ltd, in their capacity as joint and
several receivers and managers of substantially all
of the assets of Forge Group Power Pty Ltd. (In
Liquidation, Receivers and Managers Appointed),
and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF
AND FORGE DEFENDANTS REGARDING
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION REGARDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Having considered the Stipulation Regarding Deadline to Respond to Complaint by and
between Plaintiff Power Rental Asset Co Two, LLC (“Plaintiff”), on the one hand, and Defendants
Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (“Forge”) (in liquidation) (receivers and managers appointed), and Mark
Mentha and Scott Langdon of KordaMentha Pty Ltd, in their capacity as joint and several receivers
and managers of Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (collectively, “Forge Defendants”), on the other hand,
and good cause appearing therefor:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The Stipulation is APPROVED.
APR shall have through and including July 17, 2017 to file its first amended
complaint, if any.
Forge Parties shall have through and including July 31, 2017 to file their response to
the complaint or first amended complaint, as the case may be.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _________________, 2017
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States Chief District Court Judge
[PROIPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION REGARDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?