Zellers v. Metropolitan Life Ins Co.
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 selecting Private ADR by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/28/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Steven Zellers,
CASE No C 3:17-cv-03636-EMC
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.,
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Mark Humbert, Mediator.
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline: June 9, 2018
Date: 09/07/2017
Date: 09/07/2017
/s/ P. Randall Noah
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Peter J. Felsenfeld
Attorney for Defendant
1/9/2018
9/28/17
UNIT
ED
Date:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
IT IS SO ORDERED
x IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
D
RDERE
IF
S MOD
OO
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATED
IT IS S
IE JUDGE
A
A
H
ER
LI
RT
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
FO
NO
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
n
M. Che
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulationd& Proposed
e Edwar
Judg
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
R NIA
■
N
F
D IS T IC T O
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?