Pakdel et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 17 Continuing Initial Case Management Conference and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/28/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Paul F. Utrecht (CA Bar No. 118658)
UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP
109 Stevenson Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Thomas W. Connors (OH Bar No. 7226)
BLACK McCUSKEY SOUERS
& ARBAUGH, LPA
220 Market Avenue S. Suite 1000
Canton, OH 44702
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Peyman Pakdel and Sima Chegini

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICK OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

109 Stevenson Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP

14
15

Case No.: 3:17-cv-03638

PEYMAN PAKDEL and SIMA
CHEGINI,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs,

16
17

vs.

18

CITY AND COUNT OF SAN
FRANCISOC, a Chartered California City
and County; SAN FRANCISCO BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS; and elected body of
the City and County of San Francisco;
SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS, a department of the
City and County of San Francisco; and
DOES 1-25 inclusive,

19
20
21
22
23

Defendants.

24
25

The parties hereby stipulate to a continuance of the City and County of San Francisco’s

26

(“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss and the Court’s Initial Case Management Conference, and to

27

adjust the briefing schedule on that motion accordingly.

28

Stipulation and Order

-1-

1

RECITALS

2

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Peyman Pakdel and Sima Chegini (collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed

3

the above-captioned action on June 26, 2017, for alleged violation of Federal Civil Rights Under

4

42 U.S.C. §1983 and California State Law (Cal. Gov’t Code §7060-7060.7, Cal. Civil Code

5

§1954.52, Cal Const. Art. I, §1);

6
7
8
9

WHEREAS, the Court scheduled the Initial Case Management Conference on September
28, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS, Defendants on August 18, 2017, filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint and
scheduled the hearing for September 28, 2017 at 11:30 a.m.;

10

STIPULATION

11

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that:

12

1.

13

The Motion to Dismiss, currently set for September 28, 2017, be continued to

November 9, 2018, at 11:30 a.m.;

109 Stevenson Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP

14

a.

Plaintiffs’ opposition papers will be due on October 12, 2017;

15

b.

Defendants’ reply papers, if any, will be due on October 30, 2017;

16
17
18
19

2.

The Initial Case Management Conference, currently set for September 28, 2017, be

continued to December 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.;
SO STIPULATED:
Dated: August 28, 2017

UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP

20
21

By: __/s/ Paul F. Utrecht_____________
Paul F. Utrecht
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Peyman Pakdel and Sima Chegini

22
23
24

Dated: August 28, 2017

25

By: _/s/ Kristen A. Jenson____________
Kristen A. Jenson
Attorneys for Defendant
City and County of San Francisco

26
27
28

Stipulation and Order

-2-

1
2

ORDER
The Joint Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED

3

that the Motion to Dismiss currently set for September 28, 2017 at 11:30 a.m., be and hereby is

4

continued to November 9, 2018, at 11:30 a.m. Plaintiffs’ opposition papers shall be due on

5

October 12, 2017 and Defendants reply papers shall be due on October 30, 2017. IT IS

6

FURTHER ORDERED that the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for September

7

28, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., be and hereby is continued to December 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/28/17

10
11

_______________________________
Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

12
13

109 Stevenson Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105

UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stipulation and Order

-3-