Pakdel et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
19
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 17 Continuing Initial Case Management Conference and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (AMENDED TO REFLECT THE CORRECT DATE AND TIME OF THE MOTION HEARING) Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/28/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Paul F. Utrecht (CA Bar No. 118658)
UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP
109 Stevenson Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: (415)357-0600
Email: putrecht@ullawfirm.com
Thomas W. Connors (OH Bar No. 7226)
BLACK McCUSKEY SOUERS
& ARBAUGH, LPA
220 Market Avenue S. Suite 1000
Canton, OH 44702
Phone: (330)456-8341
Email: tconnors@bmsa.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Peyman Pakdel and Sima Chegini
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICK OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
109 Stevenson Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP
14
15
Case No.: 3:17-cv-03638
AMENDED
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
PEYMAN PAKDEL and SIMA
CHEGINI,
Plaintiffs,
16
17
vs.
18
CITY AND COUNT OF SAN
FRANCISOC, a Chartered California City
and County; SAN FRANCISCO BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS; and elected body of
the City and County of San Francisco;
SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS, a department of the
City and County of San Francisco; and
DOES 1-25 inclusive,
19
20
21
22
23
Defendants.
24
25
The parties hereby stipulate to a continuance of the City and County of San Francisco’s
26
(“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss and the Court’s Initial Case Management Conference, and to
27
adjust the briefing schedule on that motion accordingly.
28
Stipulation and Order
-1-
1
RECITALS
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Peyman Pakdel and Sima Chegini (collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed
3
the above-captioned action on June 26, 2017, for alleged violation of Federal Civil Rights Under
4
42 U.S.C. §1983 and California State Law (Cal. Gov’t Code §7060-7060.7, Cal. Civil Code
5
§1954.52, Cal Const. Art. I, §1);
6
WHEREAS, the Court scheduled the Initial Case Management Conference on September
7
28, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.;
8
WHEREAS, Defendants on August 18, 2017, filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint and
1:30 p.m.
scheduled the hearing for September 28, 2017 at 11:30 a.m.;
9
10
STIPULATION
11
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that:
12
1.
13
The Motion to Dismiss, currently set for September 28, 2017, be continued to
1:30 p.m.
2017
November 9, 2018, at 11:30 a.m.;
109 Stevenson Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP
14
a.
Plaintiffs’ opposition papers will be due on October 12, 2017;
15
b.
Defendants’ reply papers, if any, will be due on October 30, 2017;
16
17
18
19
2.
The Initial Case Management Conference, currently set for September 28, 2017, be
continued to December 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.;
SO STIPULATED:
Dated: August 28, 2017
UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP
20
21
By: __/s/ Paul F. Utrecht_____________
Paul F. Utrecht
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Peyman Pakdel and Sima Chegini
22
23
24
Dated: August 28, 2017
25
By: _/s/ Kristen A. Jenson____________
Kristen A. Jenson
Attorneys for Defendant
City and County of San Francisco
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order
-2-
1
2
ORDER
4
The Joint Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED
1:30 p.m.
that the Motion to Dismiss currently set for September 28, 2017 at 11:30 a.m., be and hereby is
2017 1:30 p.m.
continued to November 9, 2018, at 11:30 a.m. Plaintiffs’ opposition papers shall be due on
5
October 12, 2017 and Defendants reply papers shall be due on October 30, 2017. IT IS
6
FURTHER ORDERED that the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for September
7
28, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., be and hereby is continued to December 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.
3
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/28/17
10
11
_______________________________
Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
12
13
109 Stevenson Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?