Glackin et al v. Checkr, Inc.
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/25/18. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Nicole Baarts (SBN 226733)
nbaarts@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 397-2823
Facsimile: (415) 397-8549
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Pamela Q. Devata (to be admitted pro hac vice)
pdevata@seyfarth.com
John W. Drury (to be admitted pro hac vice)
jdrury@seyfarth.com
233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 8000
Chicago, Illinois 60606-6448
Telephone: (312) 460-5000
Facsimile: (312) 460-7000
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
CHECKR, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
CHARLES GLACKIN and NATHANIEL
ROMAN, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
17
Case No. 3:17-cv-03691-JCS
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
18
vs.
19
CHECKR, INC.,
20
Defendant.
21
22
Plaintiffs Charles Glackin and Nathaniel Roman and Defendant Checkr, Inc., by their attorneys
23
and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate that Plaintiffs’ claims
24
against Checkr are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03691-JCS
1
DATED: January 25 2018
Respectfully submitted,
2
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
3
4
By:
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
CHECKR, INC.
7
8
/s/ Nicole Baarts
Nicole Baarts
DATED: January 25, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
THE WEINER LAW FIRM LLC
9
10
By:
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LI
A
H
ER
R NIA
Spero
FO
seph C.
Judge Jo
RT
17
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
16
Dated: January 25, 2018
UNIT
ED
14
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
13
15
/s/ Jeffrey B. Sand
Jeffrey B. Sand
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03691-JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?