Glackin et al v. Checkr, Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/25/18. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Nicole Baarts (SBN 226733) nbaarts@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Pamela Q. Devata (to be admitted pro hac vice) pdevata@seyfarth.com John W. Drury (to be admitted pro hac vice) jdrury@seyfarth.com 233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 8000 Chicago, Illinois 60606-6448 Telephone: (312) 460-5000 Facsimile: (312) 460-7000 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant CHECKR, INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 CHARLES GLACKIN and NATHANIEL ROMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 17 Case No. 3:17-cv-03691-JCS STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, 18 vs. 19 CHECKR, INC., 20 Defendant. 21 22 Plaintiffs Charles Glackin and Nathaniel Roman and Defendant Checkr, Inc., by their attorneys 23 and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate that Plaintiffs’ claims 24 against Checkr are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03691-JCS 1 DATED: January 25 2018 Respectfully submitted, 2 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 3 4 By: 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant CHECKR, INC. 7 8 /s/ Nicole Baarts Nicole Baarts DATED: January 25, 2018 Respectfully submitted, THE WEINER LAW FIRM LLC 9 10 By: 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LI A H ER R NIA Spero FO seph C. Judge Jo RT 17 ERED O ORD IT IS S NO 16 Dated: January 25, 2018 UNIT ED 14 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 13 15 /s/ Jeffrey B. Sand Jeffrey B. Sand N F D IS T IC T O R C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03691-JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?