Planet Aid, Inc. et al v. Reveal, Center for Investigative Reporting et al

Filing 200

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 611(A). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 25, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PLANET AID, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 11 v. REVEAL, CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 17-cv-03695-MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 611(A) Re: Dkt. No. 166 12 13 Before the Court is plaintiffs Planet Aid, Inc. and Lisbeth Thomsen’s “Motion to 14 Exclude Evidence Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a),” filed November 6, 2018. 15 Defendants Reveal, Center for Investigative Reporting, Matt Smith, and Amy Walters 16 have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. The matter came on regularly for 17 hearing on January 18, 2019. Ethan Forrest of Covington & Burling LLP appeared on 18 behalf of defendants. Samuel Rosenthal of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP 19 appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. 20 Having considered the parties’ respective written submissions and the arguments 21 of counsel at the hearing, the motion is, for the reasons stated on the record at the 22 hearing, hereby DENIED as premature. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 25, 2019 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?