Abel v. Oceanic Arcata, LP dba Red Roof Inn et al
Filing
72
ORDER RE PREVIOUS DISCOVERY DISPUTE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/8/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SHERIE ABEL,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 17-cv-03734-SI
ORDER RE PREVIOUS DISCOVERY
DISPUTE
v.
OCEANIC ARCATA, LP, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 66
Defendants.
12
13
During the November 8, 2019 hearing on defendant Oceanic Arcata’s motion for summary
14
judgment, it was brought to the Court’s attention that its October 7, 2019 order on the parties’
15
discovery dispute (Dkt. No. 66) may have a typographical error. The October 7, 2019 order does in
16
fact have a typo on page 2 line 20. The sentence on page 2 line 20 that currently reads “Plaintiff
17
shall supplement her responses to SROGS 1-11…” should have read “Plaintiff shall supplement her
18
responses to SROGS 13-20…”
19
Plaintiff shall supplement her responses to SROGS 13-20 on or before November 22, 2019.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 8, 2019
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?