Quigley v. Yelp, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying motions to dismiss [#17], [#20], [#25] as moot.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RODNEY JAY QUIGLEY,

Case No. 17-cv-03771-RS

Plaintiff,
11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

v.

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO
DISMISS AS MOOT

12
13

YELP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

14
15
16

After defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, plaintiff filed an amended

17

complaint, adding new factual allegations, new claims, and a new defendant. Accordingly,

18

defendants’ motions to dismiss are denied as moot, without prejudice to any arguments defendants

19

may choose to advance that the complaint as amended remains defective.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: August 7, 2017
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge