Quigley v. Yelp, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying motions to dismiss [#17], [#20], [#25] as moot.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RODNEY JAY QUIGLEY, Case No. 17-cv-03771-RS Plaintiff, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT 12 13 YELP, INC., et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 After defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, plaintiff filed an amended 17 complaint, adding new factual allegations, new claims, and a new defendant. Accordingly, 18 defendants’ motions to dismiss are denied as moot, without prejudice to any arguments defendants 19 may choose to advance that the complaint as amended remains defective. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 7, 2017 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?