State of California v. Valero Energy Corporation et al
Filing
13
ORDER DENYING TRO, SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION, AND GRANTING LIMITED DISCOVERY Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/12/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
No. C 17-03786 WHA
v.
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION,
VALERO ENERGY PARTNERS LP, and
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P.,
15
Defendants.
16
ORDER DENYING TRO,
SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
MOTION, AND GRANTING
LIMITED DISCOVERY
/
17
On July 10, the State of California moved for a temporary restraining order to enjoin the
18
19
proposed sale between defendants Valero Energy Corporation, Valero Energy Partners LP
20
(“Valero”), and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (“Plains”). For the reasons stated on the
21
record, the motion is DENIED without prejudice to the State of California moving for a
22
preliminary injunction.
23
If it should choose to move for a preliminary injunction, the following schedule, fixed
24
after consulting counsel, shall apply. The State of California shall file its motion by JULY 24.
25
Defendants shall file their response by JULY 31. The State of California shall file any reply by
26
AUGUST 7. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for AUGUST 16 AT 8:00 A.M. If a fact dispute
27
arises necessitating an evidentiary hearing, that hearing will take place on AUGUST 23 AT 8:00
28
A.M.
Both motions will be heard in Courtroom 8 on the 19th Floor of 450 Golden Gate Avenue,
San Francisco.
1
Furthermore, defendants observed that their transaction has been under the investigation
2
of the California Attorney General for the past several months, during which time defendants
3
have fully cooperated. Defendants therefore requested limited discovery to be able to meet the
4
State of California’s charges.
5
Defendants are hereby granted limited discovery as set forth below. Defendants may
document requests. Finally, subject to the protective order in this action, the State of California
8
shall provide defendants with all third party documents that were generated in the course of its
9
investigation of the transaction between Valero and Plains. In order to protect the privacy of
10
third parties, the State of California shall send each third party notice that their documents are
11
For the Northern District of California
take two depositions not to exceed seven hours each. Defendants may also make limited
7
United States District Court
6
being produced to the defendants in this action by JULY 14. Third parties shall have one week
12
from the receipt of notice to object.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: July 12, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?