Thompson v. Brennan
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 briefing schedule of Motion to Dismiss and resetting CMC filed by Brian Thompson. Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 1/18/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/6/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2017)
DWANA SIMONE BAIN
(CA State Bar No. 262692)
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2443 FILLMORE St. #380-8599
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115
TELEPHONE: 415-610-8155
EMAIL:Dwana.Bain@gmail.com
Attorney For : BRIAN THOMPSON
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: 3:17-cv-03798
BRIAN THOMPSON,
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CHANGE BRIEFING
DEADLINES CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
Vs.
MEGAN J. BRENNAN,
POSTMASTER GENERAL
Date: January 18, 2017 Time: 1:30 p.m.
Place: Courtroom 5, 17th Fl. Hon.
Edward M. Chen
UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE (PACIFIC AREA),
AGENCY
Subject to the approval of the court, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties that
briefing deadlines for the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will be amended as follows:
STIPULATION 3:17-cv-03798
1
DWANA SIMONE BAIN
Attorney at Law
2443 Fillmore St. #380-8599
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 610-8155
Plaintiff will file an opposition by December 11, 2017.
Defendant will file a reply by December 18, 2017.
The parties request that any hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss be set for January 18,
2018. The parties have met and conferred at the court’s direction and have agreed to the
above-listed briefing schedule.
Subject to the approval of the court, the parties further stipulate that the initial case management
conference, currently set for January 11, 2018 at 9:30 a.m., be continued until January 18, 2018 at
9:30 a.m. The parties seek this continuance in response to Plaintiff’s counsel’s request for
additional time to file a response due to counsel’s illness.
Plaintiff’s counsel has a trial scheduled the week of January 9 (a trial that was continued
unexpectedly), which could conflict with the January 11 case management conference. At
Plaintiff counsel’s request, the parties stipulated to continue the CMC to and the hearing date to
January 18 so that Plaintiff’s counsel will be available.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 4, 2017
/S/
_________________
DWANA SIMONE BAIN*
Attorney for Plaintiff
STIPULATION 3:17-cv-03798
2
DWANA SIMONE BAIN
Attorney at Law
2443 Fillmore St. #380-8599
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 610-8155
Dated: December 4, 2017
BRIAN J. STRETCH
United States Attorney
/S/
_________________
JENNIFER S WANG
Assistant United States Attorney
for Federal Defendant
* In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer of this document attests that the
Defendants concurred in the filing of this document.
STIPULATION 3:17-cv-03798
3
DWANA SIMONE BAIN
Attorney at Law
2443 Fillmore St. #380-8599
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 610-8155
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, orders that the Plaintiff’s reply to the
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be filed by December 11, 2017.
The Defendant’s Reply shall be filed by December 18, 2017.
The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will be set for hearing on January 18, 2018.
It is further ordered that the initial case management conference currently set for January 11,
1:30 pm
2018 at 9:30 a.m. is rescheduled for January 18, 2018 at 9:30 a.m., and the deadline for the
parties to file a joint case management statement is extended until January 11, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
OO
IT IS S
IFIED
S MOD
A
hen
RT
A
H
ER
FO
NO
rd M. C
dwa
Judge E
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
STIPULATION 3:17-cv-03798
4
R NIA
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States ED
RDER District Court Judge
LI
UNIT
ED
S
12/6/17
RT
U
O
DATED:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA _____________________________
C
DWANA SIMONE BAIN
Attorney at Law
2443 Fillmore St. #380-8599
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 610-8155
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?