Blackford et al v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO REMAND. Defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion to remand shall be filed no later than July 26, 2017. Any reply shall be filed no later than August 4, 2017. The hearing on the motion remains set for August 18, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 07/19/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

G. Gregg Webb (SBN: 298787)
[e-mail]
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
One Montgomery, Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104-4505
Telephone:
415.544.1900
Facsimile:
415.391.0281
Attorneys for Defendant
UPSHER-SMITH LABORATORIES, LLC

6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JOHN W. BLACKFORD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

11

(Removed from the Superior Court of the State
of California, County of Sonoma, Case No.
SCV-260716)

v.

12
13

Case No. 3:17-cv-03825-MMC

WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

having

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO REMAND
Defendants'

AND NOW, on this day, the Court, considered Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension

16

^

1
,
(“Motion”).

17

of Time to Respond to Motion to Remand

18

of counsel, if any, the Court finds that the Motion is GRANTED.

After considering the briefing and argument

19

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants’ Response to the Motion to

20

Remand is extended up to and including July 26, 2017. The deadline to file any reply is extended up

21

to and including August 4, 2017. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion to remand will proceed as

22

scheduled on August 18, 2017.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

July 19
Dated: _______________, 2017

26
27
28

1

_________________________________
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

Although the Court, in this instance, has accepted defendants' counsel's unsworn statement as to plaintiffs'
lack of opposition, counsel is hereby ADVISED that, in the future, any such accord is to be submitted by
stipulation or, upon a showing that the filing of a stipulation is not practicable, a declaration.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Case No. 3:17-cv-03825-MMC