Blackford et al v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO REMAND. Defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion to remand shall be filed no later than July 26, 2017. Any reply shall be filed no later than August 4, 2017. The hearing on the motion remains set for August 18, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 07/19/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 G. Gregg Webb (SBN: 298787) SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. One Montgomery, Suite 2700 San Francisco, California 94104-4505 Telephone: 415.544.1900 Facsimile: 415.391.0281 Attorneys for Defendant UPSHER-SMITH LABORATORIES, LLC 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN W. BLACKFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 (Removed from the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sonoma, Case No. SCV-260716) v. 12 13 Case No. 3:17-cv-03825-MMC WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al., Defendants. 14 15 having [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO REMAND Defendants' AND NOW, on this day, the Court, considered Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension 16 ^ 1 , (“Motion”). 17 of Time to Respond to Motion to Remand 18 of counsel, if any, the Court finds that the Motion is GRANTED. After considering the briefing and argument 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants’ Response to the Motion to 20 Remand is extended up to and including July 26, 2017. The deadline to file any reply is extended up 21 to and including August 4, 2017. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion to remand will proceed as 22 scheduled on August 18, 2017. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 July 19 Dated: _______________, 2017 26 27 28 1 _________________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge Although the Court, in this instance, has accepted defendants' counsel's unsworn statement as to plaintiffs' lack of opposition, counsel is hereby ADVISED that, in the future, any such accord is to be submitted by stipulation or, upon a showing that the filing of a stipulation is not practicable, a declaration. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 3:17-cv-03825-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?