Stepanyan v. County of Alameda, et al

Filing 42

ORDER RELATING CASES AND NEW CASE MANAGEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING DATE. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 1/19/2018. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARTUR STEPANYAN, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No.17-cv-03839-SK (JSC) v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Defendants. ORDER RELATING CASES AND NEW CASE MANAGEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING DATE Re: Dkt. No. 39 12 13 The Court is in receipt of Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim’s sua sponte referral to determine 14 whether Case No. 17-cv-03839 is related to this Court’s pretrial detention ruling in Case No. 15- 15 cr-0234-CRB-3. No party has filed an objection to Judge Kim’s order. 16 After reviewing both cases the Court concludes the two cases are related as they concern 17 the same former detainee, Artur Stepanyan, and arise from this Court’s release order on June 23, 18 2015. See Civ. L.R. 3-12(a)(1) (“An action is related to another when the actions concern 19 substantially the same parties, property, transaction, or event”). Accordingly, 17-3839 shall be 20 reassigned to this Magistrate Judge. 21 The case management conference and hearing for Defendants’ motion to dismiss on 22 February 5, 2018 before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim is VACATED and reset for February 8, 23 2018 at 9 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. The parties shall file a joint case 24 management statement one week before the conference on February 1, 2018. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 19, 2018 1 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?