Gokhale v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filing 116

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 115 Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Modify Briefing Schedule and Continue Hearing Date re 113 Bill of Costs, 114 MOTION for Attorney Fees , to Tax Costs and for Expert Witness Fees filed by Sushama Gokhale. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 26, 2019. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Anton N. Handal (Bar No. 113812)
[e-mail]
Gabriel G. Hedrick (Bar No. 220649)
[e-mail]
GREENSPOON MARDER LLP
401 West A Street, Suite 1150
San Diego, California 92101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUSHAMA GOKHALE

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Laura Maechtlen (SBN 224923)
[e-mail]
Chantelle C. Egan (SBN 257938)
[e-mail]
Scott E. Atkinson (SBN 251966)
[e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Camille A. Olson (SBN 111919)
[e-mail]
Richard B. Lapp (SBN 271052)
[e-mail]
Dana L. Peterson (SBN 178499)
[e-mail]
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, California 90067-3021
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7
8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendants
DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.;
JEFFREY FEHERVARI and CONROY
SHUM

13
14
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SUSHAMA GOKHALE, an individual;
Plaintiff,

19
20

v.

23

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC., a
California corporation; JEFFREY
FEHERVARI, an individual; CONROY
SHUM, an individual; and DOES 1 to 10,
inclusive,

24

CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-03845-JST
STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER
MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND CONTINUING HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TAX
COSTS AND FOR EXPERT WITNESS
FEES AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES
(ECF No. 114)

Defendants.

21
22

Civil L.R. 7-11, 7-12

25
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:17-cv-03845-JST

1

Plaintiff Sushama Gokhale (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Dolby Laboratories, Inc.,

2

Jeffrey Fehervari, and Conroy Shum (collectively, “Defendants”) (Plaintiffs and Defendants are

3

collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”) met and conferred and agreed submit this

4

Stipulated Administrative Motion Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12:

5

WHEREAS on April 10, 2019, Defendants filed a Motion to Tax Costs and for Expert

6

Witness Fees and Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”), noticing the Motion for hearing on May 16,

7

2019 (ECF No. 114);

8

WHEREAS Plaintiff is out of the country, making communication difficult;

9

WHEREAS the Parties agree and stipulate that a short extension of the briefing schedule

10

on the motion is appropriate under the circumstances;

11

WHEREAS the Parties agree and stipulate to continue the hearing on the Motion one

12

week, until May 23, 2019, which would provide the Court with additional time to consider the

13

fully-briefed motion;

14
15

NOW THEREFORE, and good cause appearing, the parties stipulate to the following
change in the briefing and hearing schedule for the Motion

16
17

Event

Current Deadline

Proposed Deadline

18

Opposition Due

April 24, 2019

April 26, 2019

19

Reply Due

May 1, 2019

May 3, 2019

20

Hearing

May 16, 2019, 2:00 p.m.

May 23, 2019, 2:00 p.m.

21
22
23

IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.
Dated: April 24, 2019

GREENSPOON MARDER LLP

24
25
26
27

By:

/s/ Gabriel G. Hedrick
Anton N. Handal
Gabriel G. Hedrick
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUSHAMA GOKHALE

28
-2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:17-cv-03845-JST

1

Dated: April 24, 2019

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

2
By:

3
4
5
6

/s/ Scott E. Atkinson
Dana L. Peterson
Chantelle C. Egan
Scott E. Atkinson
Attorneys for Defendants
DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.; JEFFREY
FEHERVARI and CONROY SHUM

7
8

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

April 26, 2019
Dated:_________________

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:17-cv-03845-JST