Stephen J. Goth v. Insperity Support Services, L.P.

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend ADR Deadline filed by Insperity Support Services, L.P. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 19, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Arlo Garcia Uriarte (SBN 231764) arlo@liberationlawgroup.com Daniel P. Iannitelli (SBN 203388) dan@liberationlawgroup.com LIBERATION LAW GROUP, P.C. 2760 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: (415) 695-1000 Facsimile: (415) 695-1006 Attorneys for Plaintiff STEPHEN J. GOTH Mark J. Jacobs, SBN 208945 mjacobs@fisherphillips.com John T. Lai, SBN 289948 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 2050 Main Street, Suite 1000 Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: (949) 851-2424 Facsimile: (949) 851-0152 Attorneys for Defendant INSPERITY SUPPORT SERVICES, L.P., dba INSPERITY 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 STEPHEN J. GOTH, 22 23 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-03851-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE v. 24 25 26 27 INSPERITY SUPPORT SERVICES, L.P., dba INSPERITY, a Delaware limited partnership; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE FPDOCS 33546419.1 ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 For good cause shown, the parties’ stipulation is approved and the STIPULATION AND ORDER SELCTING ADR PROCESS is hereby modified in accordance with the stipulation of the parties. Specifically, the Court hereby vacates the March 30, 2018 deadline to complete mediation and orders the parties to complete mediation on or before April 30, 2018. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 19, 2018 HON. JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE FPDOCS 33546419.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?