Stephen J. Goth v. Insperity Support Services, L.P.
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend ADR Deadline filed by Insperity Support Services, L.P. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 19, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Arlo Garcia Uriarte (SBN 231764)
arlo@liberationlawgroup.com
Daniel P. Iannitelli (SBN 203388)
dan@liberationlawgroup.com
LIBERATION LAW GROUP, P.C.
2760 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: (415) 695-1000
Facsimile: (415) 695-1006
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STEPHEN J. GOTH
Mark J. Jacobs, SBN 208945
mjacobs@fisherphillips.com
John T. Lai, SBN 289948
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP
2050 Main Street, Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 851-2424
Facsimile: (949) 851-0152
Attorneys for Defendant
INSPERITY SUPPORT SERVICES, L.P.,
dba INSPERITY
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21
STEPHEN J. GOTH,
22
23
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:17-cv-03851-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND
ADR DEADLINE
v.
24
25
26
27
INSPERITY SUPPORT SERVICES,
L.P., dba INSPERITY, a Delaware
limited partnership; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE
FPDOCS 33546419.1
ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
For good cause shown, the parties’ stipulation is approved and the STIPULATION
AND ORDER SELCTING ADR PROCESS is hereby modified in accordance with the
stipulation of the parties. Specifically, the Court hereby vacates the March 30, 2018
deadline to complete mediation and orders the parties to complete mediation on or before
April 30, 2018.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 19, 2018
HON. JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE
FPDOCS 33546419.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?