Amer v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 16

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero denying as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NADER AMER, 7 Case No. 17-cv-03872-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT 9 WELLS FARGO BANK NA, 10 Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) moved to dismiss Plaintiff Nader 12 13 Amer’s original complaint. See Mot. (dkt. 7). In lieu of an opposition brief, Amer filed an 14 amended complaint on July 28, 2017, superseding the original complaint. See 1st Am. Compl. 15 (dkt. 15); Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss the original complaint is 16 therefore DENIED AS MOOT, and the hearing previously set for August 18, 2017 is 17 VACATED.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: July 31, 2017 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?