Amer v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 16

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero denying as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
NADER AMER,

7

Case No. 17-cv-03872-JCS

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS AS MOOT

9
WELLS FARGO BANK NA,

10

Re: Dkt. No. 7

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) moved to dismiss Plaintiff Nader

12
13

Amer’s original complaint. See Mot. (dkt. 7). In lieu of an opposition brief, Amer filed an

14

amended complaint on July 28, 2017, superseding the original complaint. See 1st Am. Compl.

15

(dkt. 15); Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss the original complaint is

16

therefore DENIED AS MOOT, and the hearing previously set for August 18, 2017 is

17

VACATED.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19

Dated: July 31, 2017
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge

20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28

The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all
purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).