Sweet et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 re 29 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Chuck Mere, James Sweet, Zombie Go Boom, LLC dba ZombieGoBoom. Responses due by 1/25/2018. Replies due by 2/8/2018. Motion He aring set for 3/1/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 4/26/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/3/2018 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/1/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2017)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-03953-EMC Document 31 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Todd M. Friedman (216752) Adrian R. Bacon (280332) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 21550 Oxnard Street, Suite 780 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Phone: 877-206-4741 Fax: 866-633-0228 tfriedman@toddflaw.com abacon@toddflaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Plaintiff, JAMES SWEET; CHUCK MERE; ZOMBIE GO BOOM, LLC, DBA ZOMBIEGOBOOM 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 12 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JAMES SWEET; CHUCK MERE; ZOMBIE GO BOOM, LLC, DBA ZOMBIEGOBOOM, 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE, LLC; YOUTUBE, LLC; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant. Case No. 3:17-cv-03953-EMC [Hon. Edward M. Chen] STIPULATION CONTINUING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Complaint Filed: July 13, 2017 Current Motion Hearing Date: January 4, 2018 New Date: TBD 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT -1- Case 3:17-cv-03953-EMC Document 31 Filed 12/01/17 Page 2 of 6 1 Plaintiff, JAMES SWEET; CHUCK MERE; ZOMBIE GO BOOM, LLC, 2 DBA ZOMBIEGOBOOM, (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, GOOGLE, INC. 3 (“Defendant”), hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on July 13, 2017, Plaintiff filed a purported Class Action 5 Complaint (the “Complaint”) against Defendant, and served the Complaint on 6 Defendant on or about August 4, 2017; 7 WHEREAS, on October 26, 2017, Plaintiff filed their First Amended 8 Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendant, and served the FAC on Defendant on or 9 about October 26, 2017. 10 11 WHEREAS, Defendant filed, on November 30, 2017, a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC; 12 WHEREAS, Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(a), 13 Plaintiff’s deadline to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss is 14 December 14, 2017, only 14 days after Defendant’s filing of their motion to 15 dismiss; 16 17 WHEREAS, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is scheduled to be heard on January 4, 2018; 18 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s lead counsel will be out of the country for a period 19 of time encompassing the Motion to Dismiss’s hearing date, the parties wish to 20 continue Plaintiff’s deadline to file their opposition to Defendant’s Motion to 21 Dismiss the complaint and to research and respond adequately to Defendant’s 22 issues raised in their motion to dismiss; 23 24 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the deadline to January 25, 2018 for Plaintiff to file their opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; 25 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the deadline to February 8, 26 2018 for Defendant to respond to the Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion 27 to Dismiss; 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS -2- Case 3:17-cv-03953-EMC Document 31 Filed 12/01/17 Page 3 of 6 1 WHEREAS; the parties will request this Honorable Court to vacate the 2 January 4, 2018, hearing date for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint 3 and set the hearing date for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for March 1, 2018; and 4 WHEREAS, the parties request that the case management conference 5 6 currently scheduled for March 1, 2018, be continued to May 3, 2018; Thus, it is hereby stipulated that: 7 1. Plaintiff’s deadline to file their opposition to Defendant’s Motion to 8 Dismiss is continued to January 25, 2018, and Defendant’s deadline to 9 submit a response is continued to February 8, 2018; 10 11 12 13 2. The January 4, 2018 hearing date for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is continued to March 1, 2018; and 3. The case management conference currently scheduled for March 1, 2018 is continued to May 3, 2018. 14 15 16 Dated: December 1, 2017 17 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. By:_/s/ Todd M. Friedman____ Todd M. Friedman, Esq. Adrian R. Bacon, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: December 1, 2017 P.C. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, 23 24 25 By:_/s/ Maura L. Rees______ Maura L. Rees Attorneys for Defendant 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS -3- Case 3:17-cv-03953-EMC Document 31 Filed 12/01/17 Page 4 of 6 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 7 LI ER n M. Che A H 10 RT 9 NO 8 dward Judge E R NIA DERED O OR IT IS S FO 6 UNIT ED 5 S 4 RT U O __________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA Hon. Edward M. Chen 3 N D IS T IC T R OF C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS -4- Case 3:17-cv-03953-EMC Document 31 Filed 12/01/17 Page 5 of 6 Signature Certification 1 2 3 Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative 4 Policies and Procedures Manual, I hereby certify that the content of this document 5 is acceptable to Maura L. Rees, and that I have Ms. Rees’s authorization to affix her 6 electronic signature to this document. 7 Dated: December 1, 2017 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 8 9 10 11 By:_/s/ Todd M. Friedman____ Todd M. Friedman, Esq. Adrian R. Bacon, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS -5- Case 3:17-cv-03953-EMC Document 31 Filed 12/01/17 Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Filed electronically on December 1, 2017, with: United States District Court CM/ECF system 4 5 6 7 8 Notification sent electronically on December 1, 2017, to: Honorable Judge Edward M. Chen United States District Court Northern District of California, San Francisco Division And to all counsel of record 9 10 s/Todd M. Friedman Todd M. Friedman, Esq. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS -6- Case 3:17-cv-03953-EMC Document 31-1 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 JAMES SWEET; CHUCK MERE; ZOMBIE GO BOOM, LLC, DBA ZOMBIEGOBOOM, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 GOOGLE, LLC; YOUTUBE, LLC; and DOES 115 10, inclusive, 16 No.: 3:17-cv-03953-MEJ EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE THE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –1– [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION US_ACTIVE-126011724.1 Case 3:17-cv-03953-EMC Document 31-1 Filed 12/01/17 Page 2 of 2 1 Currently before the Court is the Joint Stipulation Between Plaintiff JAMES SWEET; CHUCK 2 MERE; ZOMBIE GO BOOM, LLC, DBA ZOMBIEGOBOOM (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 3 GOOGLE, LLC; YOUTUBE, LLC (“Defendant”) To Continue The Deadline for Plaintiff to File 4 Their Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, by and through their counsel. Good cause 5 appearing, the Parties’ Joint Stipulation is GRANTED, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 6 deadlines in this matter will be continued as follows: 7 Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss: January 25, 2018 8 Defendant’s Reply: February 8, 2018 9 Hearing on Motion to Dismiss Complaint: 1:30 March 1, 2018, at _______ p.m. Case Management Conference: May 3, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED 13 1st Dec. Dated this ______ day of _________, 2017 14 15 RT 21 dw Judge E ER 23 Chen A H 22 R NIA ard M. NO 20 A FO 19 _______ DERED O ORChen Hon. Edward M. IT IS S IFIED United States District Judge S MOD LI 18 UNIT ED 17 RT U O S 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R 24 25 26 27 28 –2– [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?