Zeiger et al v. WellPet LLC et al
Filing
124
ORDER granting 123 STIPULATION to Further Continue Hearing Date on Defendant's 114 Motion to Strike. Motion Hearing reset for 11/6/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/20/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
..
Amir M. Nassihi (SBN: 235936)
anassihi@shb.com
Joan R. Camagong (SBN: 288217)
jcamagong@shb.com
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
One Montgomery, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94104
Tel: 415-544-1900 | Fax: 415-391-0291
James P. Muehlberger (admitted pro hac vice)
jmuehlberger@shb.com
Elizabeth A. Fessler (admitted pro hac vice)
efessler@shb.com
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
2555 Grand Blvd.
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
Tel: 816-474-6550 | Fax: 816-421-5547
Attorneys for Defendant
WELLPET LLC
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
DANIEL ZEIGER, Individually and on Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated,
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
Case No. 4:17-cv-04056-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE
HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STRIKE ERRATA SHEET
CHANGES TO PLAINTIFF DANIEL
ZEIGER’S JULY 27, 2018 DEPOSITION
v.
WELLPET LLC, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, the Parties in the above-entitled action hereby enter into
this stipulation with reference to the following facts and recitals:
1.
On March 22, 2019, Defendant WellPet LLC filed a Motion to Strike Errata Sheet
Changes to Plaintiff Daniel Zeiger’s July 27, 2018 Deposition. Dkt. 114.
27
2.
On April 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed an opposition to WellPet’s Motion to Strike. Dkt. 118.
28
3.
On May 8, 2019, WellPet filed a reply brief in support of its Motion to Strike. Dkt. 122.
1
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
Case No. 4:17-cv-04056-WHO
4.
2
3
The hearing date on WellPet’s Motion to Strike is currently set for June 5, 2019. Dkt.
5.
1
Private mediation is scheduled on July 30, 2019 with JAMS for this matter. Having met
121.
4
and conferred, the Parties agree that it would be most efficient to continue the hearing date on
5
WellPet’s Motion to Strike Errata Sheet Changes to Plaintiff Daniel Zeiger’s July 27, 2018 Deposition
6
until after the Parties complete mediation.
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the undersigned counsel on behalf of the
8
Parties, that the hearing date on WellPet’s Motion to Motion to Strike Errata Sheet Changes to Plaintiff
9
Daniel Zeiger’s July 27, 2018 Deposition shall be continued from June 5, 2019 to November 6, 2019.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12
Dated: May 20, 2019
13
Respectfully submitted,
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
14
By: /s/ Amir Nassihi
Amir Nassihi
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
WellPet LLC
17
18
19
20
Dated: May 20, 2019
Respectfully submitted,
LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P.
21
By: /s/ Steven McKany
Steven McKany
22
Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Zeiger
23
24
25
26
Certification of Compliance with N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04056-WHO
1
I hereby certify that pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I have obtained the authorization
2
from the above signatories to file the above-referenced document, and that the above signatories
3
concur in the filing’s content.
4
5
6
By: /s/ Amir Nassihi
Amir Nassihi
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04056-WHO
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: May 20, 2019
_______________________________________
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04056-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?