Zeiger et al v. WellPet LLC et al

Filing 124

ORDER granting 123 STIPULATION to Further Continue Hearing Date on Defendant's 114 Motion to Strike. Motion Hearing reset for 11/6/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/20/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. Amir M. Nassihi (SBN: 235936) anassihi@shb.com Joan R. Camagong (SBN: 288217) jcamagong@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. One Montgomery, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94104 Tel: 415-544-1900 | Fax: 415-391-0291 James P. Muehlberger (admitted pro hac vice) jmuehlberger@shb.com Elizabeth A. Fessler (admitted pro hac vice) efessler@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 2555 Grand Blvd. Kansas City, Missouri 64108 Tel: 816-474-6550 | Fax: 816-421-5547 Attorneys for Defendant WELLPET LLC [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 DANIEL ZEIGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, 17 18 19 Case No. 4:17-cv-04056-WHO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE ERRATA SHEET CHANGES TO PLAINTIFF DANIEL ZEIGER’S JULY 27, 2018 DEPOSITION v. WELLPET LLC, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, the Parties in the above-entitled action hereby enter into this stipulation with reference to the following facts and recitals: 1. On March 22, 2019, Defendant WellPet LLC filed a Motion to Strike Errata Sheet Changes to Plaintiff Daniel Zeiger’s July 27, 2018 Deposition. Dkt. 114. 27 2. On April 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed an opposition to WellPet’s Motion to Strike. Dkt. 118. 28 3. On May 8, 2019, WellPet filed a reply brief in support of its Motion to Strike. Dkt. 122. 1 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER Case No. 4:17-cv-04056-WHO 4. 2 3 The hearing date on WellPet’s Motion to Strike is currently set for June 5, 2019. Dkt. 5. 1 Private mediation is scheduled on July 30, 2019 with JAMS for this matter. Having met 121. 4 and conferred, the Parties agree that it would be most efficient to continue the hearing date on 5 WellPet’s Motion to Strike Errata Sheet Changes to Plaintiff Daniel Zeiger’s July 27, 2018 Deposition 6 until after the Parties complete mediation. 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the undersigned counsel on behalf of the 8 Parties, that the hearing date on WellPet’s Motion to Motion to Strike Errata Sheet Changes to Plaintiff 9 Daniel Zeiger’s July 27, 2018 Deposition shall be continued from June 5, 2019 to November 6, 2019. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 Dated: May 20, 2019 13 Respectfully submitted, SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 14 By: /s/ Amir Nassihi Amir Nassihi 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant WellPet LLC 17 18 19 20 Dated: May 20, 2019 Respectfully submitted, LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P. 21 By: /s/ Steven McKany Steven McKany 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Zeiger 23 24 25 26 Certification of Compliance with N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3) 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04056-WHO 1 I hereby certify that pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I have obtained the authorization 2 from the above signatories to file the above-referenced document, and that the above signatories 3 concur in the filing’s content. 4 5 6 By: /s/ Amir Nassihi Amir Nassihi 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04056-WHO 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 Dated: May 20, 2019 _______________________________________ HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-04056-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?