Transcend Insights, Inc v. Healogics, Inc.
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 Second Stipulation To Extend Time For Defendant to File an Initial Response To Plaintiffs Complaint and For Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants Initial Response filed by Healogics, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/13/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2017)
1 J. MICHAEL KEYES - SBN 262281
keyes.mike@dorsey.com
2 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Columbia Center
3 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100
Seattle, WA 98104-7043
4 Telephone: (206) 903-8800
Facsimile: (206) 903-8820
5
Attorney for Defendant
6 Healogics, Inc.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
AT SAN FRANCISCO
10
12
13
14
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04068-EMC
TRANSCEND INSIGHTS, INC.,
11
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SECOND STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO FILE AN INITIAL RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND
FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S INITIAL RESPONSE
v.
HEALOGICS, INC.,
Defendant.
15
16
Complaint served:
July 21, 2017
Current response due: Sept. 11, 2017
New response due: October 11, 2017
17
18
19
20
21
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Stipulation of Defendant
22 Healogics, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Transcend Insights, Inc. (“Plaintiff”)
23 (Defendant and Plaintiff, collectively, the “Parties”), to grant Defendant an additional
24 extension of time of 30 days, from September 11, 2017 through and including
25 October 11, 2017, within which to attempt to settle this action before filing and
26 serving its initial response to Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Complaint”) on file in this
27 action.
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04068-EMC
-1-
1
The Parties further stipulate that in the event the Parties do not settle, and
2 Defendant’s response consists of a motion to stay, transfer or dismiss this Action,
3 than an answer, Plaintiff shall have 30 days in which to file its opposition hereto.
4
The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties and Declaration in
5 support thereof, and for good cause shown, hereby orders as follows:
6
7
1. Defendant shall file and serve its response to Plaintiff’s Complaint no later
than October 11, 2017.
8
2. In the event that Defendant’s response to the Complaint consists of a
9
motion to stay, transfer or dismiss the action, Plaintiff shall have 30 days
10
from the date such motion is filed and served in which to file its opposition
11
or other response thereto.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
13th
September
Executed on this ____ day of _________________, 2017.
UNIT
ED
17
20
21
22
23
Edward
n
M. Che
Attorney for Defendant
Healogics, Inc.
LI
FO
Judge
s/ J. Michael Keyes
s/ Angela L. Dunning
J. MICHAEL KEYES
ANGELA L. DUNNING
ER
C
N
SBN 262281
OF
D I S T SBN 212047
RICT
keyes.mike@dorsey.com
adunning@cooley.com
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Cooley LLP
Columbia Center
3175 Hanover Street
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
Seattle, WA 98104-7043
Telephone: (650) 843-5000
Telephone: (206) 903-8800
Facsimile: (650) 849-7400
Facsimile: (206) 903-8820
A
H
19
EDWARD M. CHEN
RT
18
ERED
HONORABLE STEVEN J. MURA
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
16 Presented by:
NO
15
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
14
Attorney for Plaintiff
Transcend Insights, Inc.
24
25
Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, J. Michael
Keyes hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all
26 signatories listed above.
27
28
By:
J. Michael Keyes
J. Michael Keyes
.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04068-EMC
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?