Transcend Insights, Inc v. Healogics, Inc.

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 Fourth MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Healogics, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on October 25, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017)

1 J. MICHAEL KEYES - SBN 262281
[e-mail]
2 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Columbia Center
3 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100
Seattle, WA 98104-7043
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
Attorney for Defendant
6 Healogics, Inc.
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

AT SAN FRANCISCO

10

12
13
14

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04068-EMC

TRANSCEND INSIGHTS, INC.,

11

Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FOURTH STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO FILE AN INITIAL RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND
FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S INITIAL RESPONSE

v.
HEALOGICS, INC.,
Defendant.

15
16

Complaint served:
July 21, 2017
Current response due: Oct. 25, 2017
New response due:
Nov. 9, 2017

17
18
19
20
21

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Stipulation of Defendant

22 Healogics, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Transcend Insights, Inc. (“Plaintiff”)
23 (Defendant and Plaintiff, collectively, the “Parties”), to grant Defendant an additional
24 extension of time of 15 days, from October 25, 2017 through and including
25 November 9, 2017, within which to attempt to settle this action before filing and
26 serving its initial response to Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Complaint”) on file in this
27 action.
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04068-EMC

-1-

1

The Parties further stipulate that in the event the Parties do not settle, and

2 Defendant’s response consists of a motion to stay, transfer or dismiss this Action,
3 than an answer, Plaintiff shall have 30 days in which to file its opposition hereto.
4

The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties and Declaration in

5 support thereof, and for good cause shown, hereby orders as follows:
6
7

1. Defendant shall file and serve its response to Plaintiff’s Complaint no later
than November 9, 2017.

8

2. In the event that Defendant’s response to the Complaint consists of a

9

motion to stay, transfer or dismiss the action, Plaintiff shall have 30 days

10

from the date such motion is filed and served in which to file its opposition

11

or other response thereto.

S

15

HONORABLE STEVEN J. MURA

21
22
23

Attorney for Defendant
Healogics, Inc.

FO

LI

A

H

20

J

s/ Angela L. Dunning
ANGELA L. DUNNING
ER
C
SBN N
212047
F
D IS T IC T O
[e-mail]
Cooley LLP R
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

RT

19

s/ J. Michael Keyes
J. MICHAEL KEYES
SBN 262281
[e-mail]
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Columbia Center
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100
Seattle, WA 98104-7043
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

NO

16 Presented by:
18

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

R NIA

14

17

RT
U
O

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
October
Executed on this ____ day of _________________, 2017.
25th

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

12

Attorney for Plaintiff
Transcend Insights, Inc.

24
25

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, J. Michael
Keyes hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all
26 signatories listed above.

27
28

By:

J. Michael Keyes
J. Michael Keyes

.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04068-EMC

-2-