Transcend Insights, Inc v. Healogics, Inc.

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 selecting Private ADR by Transcend Insights, Inc filed by Transcend Insights, Inc. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/20/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Transcend Insights, Inc. CASE No C 4:17-cv-04068 EMC Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Healogics, Inc. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private ADR (specify process and provider) Parties have agreed to private mediation. Parties will jointly select a mediator. Costs to be shared evenly. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ■ ■ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline: R NIA UNIT ED en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE FO RT H E LI 11/20/17 D RDERE OO IT IS S NO Date: CT C RT U O x IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: ES AT T A Date: Nov. 17, 2017 Angela L. Dunning Attorney for Plaintiff J. Michael Keys Attorney for Defendant ISTRI D S Date: Nov. 17, 2017 C RN Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed OF D “Stipulation T Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or I S T RIC & Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?