Transcend Insights, Inc v. Healogics, Inc.
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 selecting Private ADR by Transcend Insights, Inc filed by Transcend Insights, Inc. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/20/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Transcend Insights, Inc.
CASE No C 4:17-cv-04068 EMC
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Healogics, Inc.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Parties have agreed to private mediation.
Parties will jointly select a mediator. Costs to
be shared evenly.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
■
■
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline:
R NIA
UNIT
ED
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FO
RT
H
E
LI
11/20/17
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
NO
Date:
CT
C
RT
U
O
x IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
ES
AT
T
A
Date: Nov. 17, 2017
Angela L. Dunning
Attorney for Plaintiff
J. Michael Keys
Attorney for Defendant ISTRI
D
S
Date: Nov. 17, 2017
C
RN
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
OF
D “Stipulation T Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or I S
T RIC &
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?