Glass Egg Digital Media v. Gameloft, Inc. et al

Filing 289

ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF JOINDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 2, 2022. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2022)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-04165-MMC Document 289 Filed 02/02/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 GLASS EGG DIGITAL MEDIA, 8 Plaintiff, 9 ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF JOINDER v. 10 GAMELOFT, INC., et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 17-cv-04165-MMC Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is defendant Gameloft, Inc.’s (“GLI”) “Notice of Joinder,” filed 14 15 January 26, 2022 (see Doc. No. 287), whereby GLI purports to join defendant Gameloft 16 SE’s “Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) to Dismiss [the] Fourth 17 Amended Complaint” (see Doc. No. 285). Plaintiff has filed opposition thereto. A motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) “must be made before pleading if a 18 19 responsive pleading is required.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). “In other words, a motion to 20 dismiss . . . must be filed before an answer.” Roberts v. County of Riverside, Case No. 21 EDCV 19-1877 JGB (SHKx), 2020 WL 5934303, at *2 n.4 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2014) 22 (internal quotation and citation omitted). In the instant case, GLI filed an answer to the Fourth Amended Complaint on 23 24 September 17, 2018 (see Doc. No. 149), a date prior to the filing of its Notice of Joinder, 25 and, consequently, GLI’s “purported joinder is untimely,” see Anudokem v. Am. Home 26 Mortg. Servicing, Inc., Case No. C09-01660 HRL, 2010 WL 532440, at *1 n.1 (N.D. Cal. 27 Feb. 9, 2010). 28 // Case 3:17-cv-04165-MMC Document 289 Filed 02/02/22 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, GLI’s joinder is hereby DENIED. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: February 2, 2022 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?