Trostenetsky v. The Keys Condominium Owners Association

Filing 57

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 56 to continue the Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 8/16/2018 has been continued to 10/4/2018 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/9/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ALLACCESS LAW GROUP Irene Karbelashvili, State Bar Number 232223 irene@allaccesslawgroup.com Irakli Karbelashvili, State Bar Number 302971 irakli@allaccesslawgroup.com 19 North Second Street, Suite 205 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 295-0137 Facsimile: (408) 295-0142 Attorneys for BRONYA TROSTENETSKY, Plaintiff 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 BRONYA TROSTENETSKY, 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. 16 17 18 Case No. 3:17-cv-04167-RS SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE THE KEYS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a business entity form unknown; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, 19 Defendants 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff BRONYA TROSTENETSKY 23 24 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant THE KEYS CONDOMINIUM OWERS ASSOCIATION 25 (“Defendant”)(collectively, the “Parties”), through their undersigned counsel, that the Case 26 Management Conference currently scheduled for August 16, 2018 at 10:00 AM be continued to 27 October 4, 2018 at 10:00 AM or a date sometime thereafter that is most convenient to the Court. 28 The Parties believe that good cause exists based on the following: Page 1 of 4 Case No. 3:17-CV-04167-RS Second Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference 1 1. On May 2, 2018 the Parties took part in a Court sponsored mediation. Although no 2 settlement was reached, the Parties agreed to hold another mediation session with another 3 mediator. 4 2. The parties stipulated and the Court ordered that the case be once again referred to 5 6 mediation. (Dkt. No. 51). 7 3. On June 6, 2018 the ADR Unit appointed Michael J. Timpane, Esq. as a mediator. 8 4. On July 25, 2018 the Parties took part in a pre-mediation call with Mr. Timpane. During 9 the pre-mediation call the parties agreed to hold a second pre-mediation call during which they 10 intend to agree on an actual mediation date. The second pre-mediation call is scheduled for 11 12 August 14, 2018. 13 5. The Parties anticipate that they will be able to complete mediation before the end of 14 September, 2018. 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 19 Dated: August 8, 2018 ALLACCESS LAW GROUP 20 By: /s/ Irakli Karbelashvili IRAKLI KARBELASHVILI, Attorney for Plaintiff BRONYA TROSTENETSKY 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: August 9, 2018 HARTSUYKER, STRATMAN & WILLIAMSABREGO 26 By: /s/ Robert M. Maltz ROBERT M. MALTZ, Attorney for DEFENDANT THE KEYS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION 27 28 Page 2 of 4 Case No. 3:17-CV-04167-RS Second Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference 1 2 FILER’S ATTESTATION 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that on August 9, 2018, I, received the 4 concurrence of Robert M. Maltz, Esq. in the filing of this document 5 6 By:/s/ Irakli Karbelashvili IRAKLI KARBELASHVILI 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 4 Case No. 3:17-CV-04167-RS Second Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Having reviewed the above stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED 3 that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 16, 2018 be rescheduled 4 to October 4, 2018 at 10:00 AM. 5 6 7 Dated: __________ 8/9/18 _______________________ United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 4 of 4 Case No. 3:17-CV-04167-RS Second Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?