Nilsen v. Andrew et al

Filing 22

ORDER RE AMENDED COMPLAINT re 21 Amended Complaint filed by Michael David Nilsen. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/25/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

MICHAEL NILSEN,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Plaintiff,

No. C 17-04175 WHA

v.
JUDGE ANDREW BLUM, et al.,

ORDER RE AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Defendants.
/

14
15

On September 21, pro se plaintiff Michael Nilsen filed an untimely amended complaint

16

without leave of the Court. Nevertheless, all arguments made in defendants’ motion to dismiss

17

still have applicability to the amended complaint. The changes in the amended complaint being

18

insignificant, the hearing on the motion to dismiss will proceed as scheduled, with the

19

arguments in the motion to dismiss applied to the amended complaint.

20
21
22
23

As stated in an earlier order, Nilsen shall file a response to the motion to dismiss by
SEPTEMBER 27. If he fails to do so, the complaint will be DISMISSED.
In the event that plaintiff files a response, defendants shall have until OCTOBER 3 to file
their reply. The hearing on the motion remains unchanged.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: September 25, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE