Nilsen v. Andrew et al

Filing 22

ORDER RE AMENDED COMPLAINT re 21 Amended Complaint filed by Michael David Nilsen. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/25/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 MICHAEL NILSEN, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, No. C 17-04175 WHA v. JUDGE ANDREW BLUM, et al., ORDER RE AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. / 14 15 On September 21, pro se plaintiff Michael Nilsen filed an untimely amended complaint 16 without leave of the Court. Nevertheless, all arguments made in defendants’ motion to dismiss 17 still have applicability to the amended complaint. The changes in the amended complaint being 18 insignificant, the hearing on the motion to dismiss will proceed as scheduled, with the 19 arguments in the motion to dismiss applied to the amended complaint. 20 21 22 23 As stated in an earlier order, Nilsen shall file a response to the motion to dismiss by SEPTEMBER 27. If he fails to do so, the complaint will be DISMISSED. In the event that plaintiff files a response, defendants shall have until OCTOBER 3 to file their reply. The hearing on the motion remains unchanged. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: September 25, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?