Rearden LLC et al v. Crystal Dynamics, Inc. et al
Filing
148
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL re 147 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 128 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Rearden Mova LLC, Rearden LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 31, 2019. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice)
Mark S. Carlson (pro hac vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1301 Second Ave., Ste. 2000
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
steve@hbsslaw.com
markc@hbsslaw.com
Rio S. Pierce, CBA No. 298297
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: (510) 725-3000
Facsimile: (510) 725-3001
riop@hbsslaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Rearden LLC and Rearden Mova LLC
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
REARDEN LLC, REARDEN MOVA LLC,
California limited liability companies,
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiffs,
v.
CRYSTAL, INC., a California corporation,
SQUARE ENIX INC., a Washington Corporation,
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST
Case No. 3:17-cv-04187-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL
TIME TO RESPOND TO
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
SEAL
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Ctrm:
February 28, 2019
2:00 p.m.
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
9, 19th Floor
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION
The above-captioned parties through their undersigned attorneys of record hereby stipulate
and agree as follows:
Whereas, on January 22, 2019, Rearden attorney Mark Carlson served and filed Rearden’s
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal certain documents designated by defendants and nonparties Digital Domain 3.0 (“DD3”) and Microsoft as confidential pursuant to the Protective Order in
the present case and portions of its opposition brief referencing such documents;
Whereas, Rearden served non-parties DD3 and Microsoft by email on January 23, 2019 with
a copy of the Declaration of Mark Carlson in Support of Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in
compliance with Local Rule 79-5(e);
Whereas, the service packages erroneously included confidential materials of both
defendants and non-parties;
Whereas, Mr. Carlson learned of the error at 6:12 PM on January 29, 2019 by email from
Scott Kolassa of DD3 (who represented that DD3 had properly suspended review of the service
package upon discovery of the confidential materials), responded at 6:23 PM that Mr. Kolassa should
delete the service package and promised to serve materials in conformance with Local Rule 79-5(e)
promptly;
Whereas, at 8:17 AM on January 30 Mr. Carlson contacted Jennifer Yokoyama of Microsoft
by email and informed her of the error, requested that copies of the service package be deleted, and
promised to serve materials in conformance with Local Rule 79-5(e) promptly, Ms. Yokoyama
replied that she had not received the service package, and shortly thereafter replied further that she
had found it in her spam folder and deleted it; and
Whereas, although both non-parties have confirmed that they did not review any confidential
information erroneously included in the administrative motion service packages, Mr. Carlson
assumes sole and exclusive responsibility for the above unintentional violation of the Protective
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST
1
Order with respect to the non-party service packages, and if someone is to be held accountable, Mr.
2
Carlson requests that it be him alone;
3
Whereas, neither the Defendants nor third parties DD3 and Microsoft waive their rights to
4
seek further redress for Plaintiffs’ actions by joining in this stipulation and all rights are reserved;
5
The parties stipulate and agree that Rearden shall re-serve Microsoft and DD3 with the
6
Declaration of Mark Carlson in Support of Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, as well as a
7
redacted version of Plaintiff’s Opposition, and only provide those excerpts and documents that
8
pertain to them and that Microsoft and DD3 may have four business days from the date of the order
9
below to submit a responsive declaration pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e)(1). The parties further
10
stipulate and agree that Defendants may have an additional four business days from this order to file
11
any supplemental papers necessary in response to Plaintiffs’ amended filings.
12
So stipulated:
13
14
RIMON, P.C.
Dated: January 31, 2019
By:
15
16
/s/
Karineh Khachatourian
Karineh Khachatourian
Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk
Attorneys for Defendants,
SQUARE ENIX, INC. and
CRYSTAL DYNAMICS, INC.
17
18
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO
19
20
Dated: January 31, 2019
By:
21
/s/
Mark Carlson
Mark S. Carlson (Pro Hac Vice)
Steve Berman
Rio S. Pierce
22
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
REARDEN LLC and
REARDEN MOVA LLC
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
January 31
DATED: _______________, 2019
4
5
6
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST
1
2
CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION
I, Mark Carlson, am the ECF user whose credentials were utilized in the electronic filing of this
3
document. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Karineh Khachatourian
4
concurred in the filing of this document.
5
/s/ Mark Carlson
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
NON-PARTIES ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?