Rearden LLC et al v. Crystal Dynamics, Inc. et al

Filing 148

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL re 147 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 128 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Rearden Mova LLC, Rearden LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 31, 2019. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) Mark S. Carlson (pro hac vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1301 Second Ave., Ste. 2000 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com markc@hbsslaw.com Rio S. Pierce, CBA No. 298297 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 riop@hbsslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Rearden LLC and Rearden Mova LLC 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION REARDEN LLC, REARDEN MOVA LLC, California limited liability companies, 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiffs, v. CRYSTAL, INC., a California corporation, SQUARE ENIX INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST Case No. 3:17-cv-04187-JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Date: Time: Judge: Ctrm: February 28, 2019 2:00 p.m. Hon. Jon S. Tigar 9, 19th Floor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION The above-captioned parties through their undersigned attorneys of record hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Whereas, on January 22, 2019, Rearden attorney Mark Carlson served and filed Rearden’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal certain documents designated by defendants and nonparties Digital Domain 3.0 (“DD3”) and Microsoft as confidential pursuant to the Protective Order in the present case and portions of its opposition brief referencing such documents; Whereas, Rearden served non-parties DD3 and Microsoft by email on January 23, 2019 with a copy of the Declaration of Mark Carlson in Support of Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in compliance with Local Rule 79-5(e); Whereas, the service packages erroneously included confidential materials of both defendants and non-parties; Whereas, Mr. Carlson learned of the error at 6:12 PM on January 29, 2019 by email from Scott Kolassa of DD3 (who represented that DD3 had properly suspended review of the service package upon discovery of the confidential materials), responded at 6:23 PM that Mr. Kolassa should delete the service package and promised to serve materials in conformance with Local Rule 79-5(e) promptly; Whereas, at 8:17 AM on January 30 Mr. Carlson contacted Jennifer Yokoyama of Microsoft by email and informed her of the error, requested that copies of the service package be deleted, and promised to serve materials in conformance with Local Rule 79-5(e) promptly, Ms. Yokoyama replied that she had not received the service package, and shortly thereafter replied further that she had found it in her spam folder and deleted it; and Whereas, although both non-parties have confirmed that they did not review any confidential information erroneously included in the administrative motion service packages, Mr. Carlson assumes sole and exclusive responsibility for the above unintentional violation of the Protective 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST 1 Order with respect to the non-party service packages, and if someone is to be held accountable, Mr. 2 Carlson requests that it be him alone; 3 Whereas, neither the Defendants nor third parties DD3 and Microsoft waive their rights to 4 seek further redress for Plaintiffs’ actions by joining in this stipulation and all rights are reserved; 5 The parties stipulate and agree that Rearden shall re-serve Microsoft and DD3 with the 6 Declaration of Mark Carlson in Support of Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, as well as a 7 redacted version of Plaintiff’s Opposition, and only provide those excerpts and documents that 8 pertain to them and that Microsoft and DD3 may have four business days from the date of the order 9 below to submit a responsive declaration pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e)(1). The parties further 10 stipulate and agree that Defendants may have an additional four business days from this order to file 11 any supplemental papers necessary in response to Plaintiffs’ amended filings. 12 So stipulated: 13 14 RIMON, P.C. Dated: January 31, 2019 By: 15 16 /s/ Karineh Khachatourian Karineh Khachatourian Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk Attorneys for Defendants, SQUARE ENIX, INC. and CRYSTAL DYNAMICS, INC. 17 18 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO 19 20 Dated: January 31, 2019 By: 21 /s/ Mark Carlson Mark S. Carlson (Pro Hac Vice) Steve Berman Rio S. Pierce 22 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, REARDEN LLC and REARDEN MOVA LLC 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 January 31 DATED: _______________, 2019 4 5 6 The Honorable Jon S. Tigar 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST 1 2 CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION I, Mark Carlson, am the ECF user whose credentials were utilized in the electronic filing of this 3 document. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Karineh Khachatourian 4 concurred in the filing of this document. 5 /s/ Mark Carlson 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTIES ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Case No.: 3:17-cv-04187-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?