Rearden LLC et al v. Crystal Dynamics, Inc. et al

Filing 86

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 85 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 49 Amended Complaint, Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline for Defendants to Answer First Amended Complaint filed by Crystal Dynamics, Inc., Square Enix Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 25, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2018)

Download PDF
1 DUANE MORRIS LLP Karineh Khachatourian (CA SBN 202634) 2 kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com Daniel T. McCloskey (CA SBN 191944) 3 dtmccloskey@duanemorris.com Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk (CA SBN 286633) 4 nawoloszczuk@duanemorris.com 2475 Hanover Street 5 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194 Telephone: 650.847.4150 6 Facsimile: 650.847.4151 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants SQUARE ENIX, INC. and CRYSTAL DYNAMICS, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 REARDEN LLC and REARDEN MOVA LLC, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 v. CRYSTAL DYNAMICS, INC., a California corporation, SQUARE ENIX, INC., a Washington Corporation, 18 Defendants. Case No. 3:17-cv-04187-JST JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DM2\8959914 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFS’ TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04187-JST 1 Plaintiffs Rearden LLC and Rearden MOVA LLC (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Crystal 2 Dynamics, Inc. and Square Enix, Inc. (“Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, 3 stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on June 18, 2018 the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ 5 motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaints; 6 WHEREAS, the Defendants’ current deadline to file Answers to the First Amended 7 Complaints is July 2, 2018, per Fed. R. Civ. P. 14(a)(4)(A); 8 WHEREAS, because each of the First Amended Complaints contains 145 or more 9 paragraphs, Defendants have requested that they have 30 days from June 18, 2018 within which to 10 file answers to the First Amended Complaints; 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to Defendants’ request for additional time; 12 NOW THEREFORE, for good cause, the parties stipulate as follows: 13 The Defendants in each case shall have 30 days from the Court’s order granting in part and 14 denying in part Defendants’ motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaints, i.e., through and 15 including July 18, 2018, within which to file Answers to the First Amended Complaints. 16 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 19 20 DUANE MORRIS LLP 21 22 23 24 25 26 Dated: June 22, 2018 By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian Karineh Khachatourian Daniel T. McCloskey Nikolaus A. Woloszczuk Attorneys for Defendants, SQUARE ENIX, INC. and CRYSTAL DYNAMICS, INC. 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFS’ TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04187-JST 1 2 3 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO Dated: June 22, 2018 4 5 By: /s/ Mark S. Carlson Steve W. Berman Mark S. Carlson Rio S. Pierce Attorneys for Plaintiffs, REARDEN LLC and REARDEN MOVA LLC 6 7 8 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 June 25, 2018 11 Dated: ____________, 2018 HON. JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFS’ TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04187-JST 1 CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION 2 I, Karineh Khachatourian, am the ECF user whose credentials were utilized in the electronic 3 filing of this document. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Mark S. 4 Carlson concurred in the filing of this document. 5 6 /s/ Karineh Khachatourian Karineh Khachatourian 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFS’ TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04187-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?