PHAM v. BOARD OF REGENTS UCSF et al
Filing
24
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C-18-1498-PJH. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/25/18. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT
5
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA
6
7
HIEU PHAM
M,
v.
9
10
11
Case No. 18-cv-014
498-PJH
Plaintiff,
8
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE
S
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Y
e
REFERRA FOR PU
AL
URPOSE O
OF
DETERMI
INING REL
LATIONSHI OF
IP
CASES
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
During the hearing on defend
dants’ pend
ding motion to dismiss in the abo
n
s
ove-entitled
14
15
se,
de
f
edly identica pending action befo the
al
ore
cas the court was mad aware of a purporte
16
Ho
onorable William H. Or
rrick, Pham v. Board o Regents o the University of Ca
of
of
alifornia, et
17
al., C 17-4194
4-WHO. While the causes of act
W
tion differ be
etween the two cases the
e
s,
18
underlying fac
ctual allega
ations and parties appe to be th same.
p
ear
he
Pursua to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-en
ant
L
e
ntitled case is hereby
19
20
RE
EFERRED to the Hono
t
orable Willia H. Orric for consideration of whether th case is
am
ck
f
his
21
related to Pha v. Board of Regent of the Un
am
d
ts
niversity of California, et al., C 17
7-4194-
22
WH
HO.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: April 25, 2018
2
__
__________
__________
__________
_______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?