PHAM v. BOARD OF REGENTS UCSF et al

Filing 24

Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C-18-1498-PJH. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/25/18. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL N RN CT LIFORNIA 6 7 HIEU PHAM M, v. 9 10 11 Case No. 18-cv-014 498-PJH Plaintiff, 8 BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE S UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Y e REFERRA FOR PU AL URPOSE O OF DETERMI INING REL LATIONSHI OF IP CASES United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 During the hearing on defend dants’ pend ding motion to dismiss in the abo n s ove-entitled 14 15 se, de f edly identica pending action befo the al ore cas the court was mad aware of a purporte 16 Ho onorable William H. Or rrick, Pham v. Board o Regents o the University of Ca of of alifornia, et 17 al., C 17-4194 4-WHO. While the causes of act W tion differ be etween the two cases the e s, 18 underlying fac ctual allega ations and parties appe to be th same. p ear he Pursua to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-en ant L e ntitled case is hereby 19 20 RE EFERRED to the Hono t orable Willia H. Orric for consideration of whether th case is am ck f his 21 related to Pha v. Board of Regent of the Un am d ts niversity of California, et al., C 17 7-4194- 22 WH HO. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: April 25, 2018 2 __ __________ __________ __________ _______ PH HYLLIS J. H HAMILTON Un nited States District Ju s udge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?