Aguilar v. CSK Auto, Inc. et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 18 to extend stay pending action by the Ninth Circuit. Status Conference set for 4/12/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/9/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ADRIAN AGUILAR, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
10
Plaintiffs,
11
v.
12
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04263-RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND STAY OF
ACTION PENDING ACTION BY THE
NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
CSK AUTO, INC., O’REILLY
AUTOMOTIVE STORES, INC., and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
13
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On January 9, 2018, Plaintiff ADRIAN AGUILAR (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants CSK
AUTO, INC., now known as O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, and O’REILLY AUTOMOTIVE
STORES, INC. (collectively, “O’Reilly”), filed a stipulation to extend the stay in this action
pending resolution of a Rule 23(f) petition for immediate appeal by the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals in a first-filed action. Having read and considered the parties’ stipulation, and finding
good cause therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
This stay currently in place in this action shall be continued and extended, for all
purposes, for a period of ninety (90) days from the entry of this Order.
2.
If the Ninth Circuit denies the plaintiff’s Rule 23(f) petition in the Davidson
Action during the pendency of the stay in this action, the stay shall be lifted and O’Reilly shall
have 30 days to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s operative pleading in this action; and,
8307936.1
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04263-RS
3.
1
That initial case management conference and all other deadlines in this action are
2
April 12
10:00 am
hereby vacated. A status conference will be held on _____________________, at ___________,
3
to address the status of the class certification proceedings in the Davidson action, and the
4
potential interlocutory appeal of the same, and, if appropriate, to set new dates in this action.
5
6
DATED: _______________
1/9/18
7
8
__________________________________
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8307936.1
2
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04263-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?