Duke Partners II, LLC v. Casillas et al

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION by Judge William Alsup [granting 13 Motion to Remand]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/24/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dl, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DUKE PARTNERS II, LLC, 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, No. C 17-04335 WHA v. ARNOLDO G. CASILLAS and IRMA V. JASSO, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION Defendants. / 14 15 Defendant Arnoldo Casillas previously removed this action from state court, only to 16 have it remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because even though that removal was 17 predicated on federal-question jurisdiction, no federal question was presented in the complaint. 18 Undeterred, Casillas, this time with co-defendant Irma Jasso, once again improperly removed 19 this case to federal court based on federal-question jurisdiction with a new removal notice 20 copied and pasted from the previous defective notice. This order GRANTS plaintiff’s motion to 21 remand (Dkt. 13) to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, for the same reasons 22 set forth in the remand order in the related case. See Duke Partners v. Casillas, No. C 17-00936 23 WHA (Dkt. 20). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 24, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?