Duke Partners II, LLC v. Casillas et al
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION by Judge William Alsup [granting 13 Motion to Remand]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/24/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dl, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DUKE PARTNERS II, LLC,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. C 17-04335 WHA
v.
ARNOLDO G. CASILLAS and
IRMA V. JASSO,
ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO REMAND
REMOVED ACTION
Defendants.
/
14
15
Defendant Arnoldo Casillas previously removed this action from state court, only to
16
have it remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because even though that removal was
17
predicated on federal-question jurisdiction, no federal question was presented in the complaint.
18
Undeterred, Casillas, this time with co-defendant Irma Jasso, once again improperly removed
19
this case to federal court based on federal-question jurisdiction with a new removal notice
20
copied and pasted from the previous defective notice. This order GRANTS plaintiff’s motion to
21
remand (Dkt. 13) to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, for the same reasons
22
set forth in the remand order in the related case. See Duke Partners v. Casillas, No. C 17-00936
23
WHA (Dkt. 20).
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 24, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?