Deigner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 16, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2018)

1 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
REBECCA S. SAELAO (State Bar No. 222731)
2 LASZLO LADI (State Bar No. 265564)
[e-mail]
3 SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
4 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO

11
12 FRIEDRICH DEIGNER,

Case No. 3:17-cv-04350-JST

13

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

14

Plaintiff,
vs.

15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

The Hon. Jon S. Tigar

16

Action Filed:

Defendant.

August 1, 2017

17
18

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Friedrich Deigner (“Plaintiff”)

20 and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), that the action be dismissed wih
t
21 p u d i pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that each party shall
rej ce
22 bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
23 DATED: February 16, 2018

Lemberg Law, LLC

24
25

By:

26
27

/
s/Tri t G. ent
nete
K
Trinette G. Kent

Attorneys for Plaintiff FRIEDRICH DEIGNER

28
07685.1910/11090285.1

3:17-cv-04350-JST
1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 DATED: February 16, 2018
2

SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation

3
By:

4

/ aszl L ad i
s/L
o
Laszlo Ladi

5
Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

6
7
8

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I – Laszlo Ladi – attest that concurrence in the filing of

9 this document has been obtained from Trinette G. Kent.
10

/ aszl L ad i
s/L
o

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07685.1910/11090285.1

3:17-cv-04350-JST
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties Plaintiff’s action against Wells Fargo Bank,

3 N.A. is dismissed wihp u d i
t rej ce.
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6 DATED:

February 16, 2018

7

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07685.1910/11090285.1

3:17-cv-04350-JST
3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER