CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. Zynga, Inc.

Filing 119

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/22/2020. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2020)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
[e-mail]
Erik R. Puknys (SBN 190926)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Robert F. Shaffer, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
Anthony D. Del Monaco, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001-4413
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

DURIE TANGRI LLP
TIMOTHY SAULSBURY (SBN 281434)
[e-mail]
RAGHAV KRISHNAPRIYAN (SBN 273411)
[e-mail]
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415-362-6666
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
Attorneys for Defendant
ZYNGA INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC, AND
INTERACTIVE GAMES LIMITED

14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17
18

CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC, AND
INTERACTIVE GAMES LIMITED,
Plaintiffs and
Counterclaim-Defendants,

19
20
21
22
23

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-04354-RS
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
ORDER

v.
ZYNGA, INC.,
Defendant and
Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-04354-RS
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

1
2

All responding Parties to the above-captioned action, pursuant to the provisions of Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate as follows:

3

1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the Parties;

4

2. All claims brought or raised by Plaintiffs CG Technology Development, LLC,

5

Interactive Games LLC, and Interactive Games Limited (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)

6

against Defendant Zynga Inc. (“Zynga”) in this action or any predecessor action,

7

including without limitation Case No. 16-cv-00859, filed in the District of Nevada, are

8

dismissed with prejudice;

9

3. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and each of their predecessors, successors, assigns,

10

affiliates, divisions, and subsidiaries hereby irrevocably and unconditionally covenant

11

not to bring (or support or encourage a third party to bring) any lawsuit, claim,

12

administrative action, demand, or action against Zynga or any of Zynga’s current or

13

future parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, distributors, direct suppliers,

14

manufacturers, direct and downstream customers, divestitures, and/or acquired entities

15

for any past, current, or future infringement (including direct, indirect, or willful

16

infringement relating to any past, current, or future products) of U.S. Patent Nos.

17

6,899,628, 6,966,832, 6,979,267, 7,029,394, 7,534,169, 8,342,924, 9,111,417, and

18

RE39,818 (collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”), including any reissue, reexamination,

19

inter partes review certificate, or certificate of correction of the Patents-in-Suit;

20

4. In exchange for the covenant recited in paragraph 3, Zynga agrees and the Parties

21

stipulate to dismiss with prejudice the counterclaims in Defendant’s Answer to

22

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (ECF No. 74); and

23

5. Each Party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this action.

24

IT IS SO STIPULATED

25

DATED this 22nd of July, 2020.

26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-04354-RS
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

1
2
3

By:/s/ Erik R. Puknys

4
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC, AND
INTERACTIVE GAMES LIMITED

5
6
7

DURIE TANGRI LLP

8
9

By:/s/ Raghav Krishnapriyan
Raghav Krishnapriyan

10
11

Attorneys for Defendant
ZYNGA INC.

12

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

13
14

Counsel for Plaintiffs hereby attests by his signature below that concurrence in

15

the filing of this document was obtained from counsel for Zynga.

16

Dated: July 22, 2020
/s/ Erik R. Puknys
Erik R. Puknys

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-04354-RS
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

1

ORDER

2
3

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED,

4
5
6
7
8

July 22, 2020
Dated: ___________________

____________________________________
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
Northern District of California

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-04354-RS
PROPOSED ORDER