Peters v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 46 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Michael Peters, filed by Michael Peters. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 30, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL PETERS CASE No C 17-04367-JST Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 7 months from the decision on the Motion to Dismiss the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: Date: November __, 2017 Date: November __, 2017 X /s/ Adam L. Hoipkemier Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ K. Issac deVyver Attorney for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: The ADR session deadline is August 13, 2018. Date: November 30, 2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?