Peters v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 46 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Michael Peters, filed by Michael Peters. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 30, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL PETERS
CASE No C 17-04367-JST
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 7 months from the decision on the Motion to Dismiss
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
■
other requested deadline:
Date: November __, 2017
Date: November __, 2017
X
/s/ Adam L. Hoipkemier
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ K. Issac deVyver
Attorney for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: The ADR session deadline is
August 13, 2018.
Date: November 30, 2017
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?