Shirman v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 selecting Private ADR by The Prudential Insurance Company of America filed by The Prudential Insurance Company of America, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/30/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JESSA SHIRMAN CASE No C 17-cv-04401-EMC Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) Mediator to be Determined. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: xx the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline: Date: October 25, 2017 IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: October 30, 2017 UNIT ED Date: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S x /s/ Bernard R. Schwam Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Tatiana Semerjian Nunneri Attorney for Defendant DERED O OR IT IS S R NIA Date: October 25, 2017 LI RT FO NO U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE . Chen dward M Judge E Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 RN A H Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” E F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?