Shirman v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 selecting Private ADR by The Prudential Insurance Company of America filed by The Prudential Insurance Company of America, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/30/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JESSA SHIRMAN
CASE No C 17-cv-04401-EMC
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■ Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Mediator to be Determined.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
xx
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline:
Date: October 25, 2017
IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
October 30, 2017
UNIT
ED
Date:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
x
/s/ Bernard R. Schwam
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Tatiana Semerjian Nunneri
Attorney for Defendant
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
R NIA
Date: October 25, 2017
LI
RT
FO
NO
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
. Chen
dward M
Judge E
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
RN
A
H
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
E
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?