Martinez v. Sullivan

Filing 17

Order denying 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel Nunc Pro Tunc. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICKY MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No.17-cv-04436-JD ORDER RE MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL NUNC PRO TUNC v. WILLIAM SULLIVAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendants. 12 13 The request for appointment of counsel is denied. Petitioner has not shown a likelihood of 14 success on the merits, and the issues are not sufficiently complex that the ends of justice warrant 15 appointed counsel. Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2018 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES DONATO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?