Martinez v. Sullivan
Filing
17
Order denying 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel Nunc Pro Tunc. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RICKY MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No.17-cv-04436-JD
ORDER RE MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL NUNC PRO TUNC
v.
WILLIAM SULLIVAN, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 14
Defendants.
12
13
The request for appointment of counsel is denied. Petitioner has not shown a likelihood of
14
success on the merits, and the issues are not sufficiently complex that the ends of justice warrant
15
appointed counsel. Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983).
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 28, 2018
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?