Wen et al v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue the Stay of Proceedings Pursuant to Settlement Agreement filed by Elaine Duke, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, Nicholas Colucci, James McCament. Motions due by 6/11/2018. Cross Motions due by 7/13/2018. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 2, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YING WEN, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 17-cv-04495-JST ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE STAY v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., Re: ECF No. 35 Defendants. 12 13 The Court received the parties’ stipulated request to continue the stay set in this case. ECF 14 No. 35. The stay is currently set to expire on May 4, 2018. In an excess of caution, the Court 15 extends all pending Court deadlines by 60 days. Plaintiffs have until June 11, 2018 to file a 16 motion for summary judgment. Defendants have until July 13, 2018 to file their opposition and 17 cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have until August 7, 2018 to file their opposition 18 and reply. Finally Defendants have until August 21, 2018 to file their reply. 19 Given that the Court has extended deadlines by more time than anticipated by the parties’ 20 stay request, the Court assumes that no further extensions will be necessary. Any request for an 21 extension must include a declaration explaining why the parties have been unable to file their 22 stipulated dismissal. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 2, 2018 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?