Woskow v. Lee
Filing
12
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 10 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2017)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
TIMOTHY WOSKOW,
Case No. 17-cv-04542-RS
Plaintiff,
6
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
7
8
ALFRED LEE,
Defendant.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Defendant Alfred Lee moves to dismiss plaintiff Timothy Woskow’s complaint, which
12
advances California common law claims for negligence and breach of contract on the basis of Lee
13
allegedly losing Woskow’s household items and ranch/farm equipment to theft while moving
14
them from Arizona to California. Lee persuasively argues Woskow’s state-law claims are
15
preempted by the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706. “It is well settled that the Carmack
16
Amendment is the exclusive cause of action for interstate-shipping contract claims alleging loss or
17
damage to property and thus completely preempts such claims.” Smallwood v. Allied Van Lines,
18
Inc., 660 F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir. 2011) (citation and internal quotation mark omitted). Woskow
19
has not filed timely opposition to Lee’s motion. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the motion is
20
suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing set for September 28, 2017, is hereby
21
vacated, and the motion to dismiss is granted with leave to amend. Woskow shall submit any
22
amended complaint within 21 days of the issuance of this order.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 30, 2017
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?